Rios Hernandez v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Plaintiff: Luis Alejandro Rios Hernandez
Defendant: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Case Number: 1:2021cv24015
Filed: November 15, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Roy K Altman
Referring Judge: Lisette M Reid
Nature of Suit: Naturalization Application
Cause of Action: 08 U.S.C. ยง 1446
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 1, 2021 Filing 6 Clerks Notice of Receipt of Filing Fee received on 12/1/2021 in the amount of $402.00, receipt number FLS100240958. (jcs)
November 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 AMENDED ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMAPAUPERIS AND STRIKING ECF NO. 4 re #4 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, as to #4 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. ( Filing Fee due by 12/17/2021.) Plaintiffs Motion is DENIED without prejudice. On or before December 17, 2021, Plaintiff shall either pay the full filing fee of $402.00 or shall complete and file a renewed application to proceed without payment of fees satisfying the requirement of poverty. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 11/17/2021. See attached document for full details. (drz)
November 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STRICKEN PER ORDER DE#5 -ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 11/16/2021. See attached document for full details. (drz) Modified on 11/17/2021 (drz).
November 15, 2021 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Luis Alejandro Rios Hernandez. (jao)
November 15, 2021 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Roy K. Altman and Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jao)
November 15, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. Filing fees $ 402.00. IFP Filed, filed by Luis Alejandro Rios Hernandez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)Case restricted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. (jao)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rios Hernandez v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Luis Alejandro Rios Hernandez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Represented By: Noticing INS Attorney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?