Sardinas v. Resurgent Capital Services, L.P.
| Napoleon Sardinas |
| Resurgent Capital Services, L.P. |
| 1:2021cv24158 |
| November 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Jonathan Goodman |
| Robert N Scola |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #9 Unopposed Motion to Stay The Case. The Court orders that the parties shall file a joint motion to reopen the case within thirty days of the Eleventh Circuits ruling en banc. The Clerk shall administratively close this case. All pending motion are denied as moot. Closing Case. Motions Terminated: #5 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Napoleon Sardinas, #9 Unopposed MOTION to Stay Pending En Banc Review by the Eleventh Circuit in Hunstein v. Preferred Collection and Management Services, Inc. filed by Resurgent Capital Services, L.P.. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr on 12/16/2021. See attached document for full details. (drz)
|
| Filing 10 RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Resurgent Capital Services, L.P.. Replies due by 12/23/2021. (Marees, John) |
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION to Stay Pending En Banc Review by the Eleventh Circuit in Hunstein v. Preferred Collection and Management Services, Inc. by Resurgent Capital Services, L.P.. Responses due by 12/27/2021 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Marees, John) |
| Filing 8 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Napoleon Sardinas (Patti, Thomas) |
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Resurgent Capital Services, L.P. identifying Corporate Parent Alegis Group, LLC, Corporate Parent Resurgent Holdings, LLC for Resurgent Capital Services, L.P. (Marees, John) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint re the Notice of Removal with Jury Demand by Resurgent Capital Services, L.P.. (Marees, John) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Napoleon Sardinas. (Patti, Thomas) |
|
Filing 4
MAGISTRATE JUDGE GOODMAN'S DISCOVERY PROCEDURES ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman on 12/1/2021. See attached document for full details. (fbn)
|
|
Filing 3
Order Requiring Discovery and Scheduling Conference and Order Referring Discovery Matters to the Magistrate Judge, referring case to Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman for Discovery Matters. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr on 11/30/2021. See attached document for full details. (pcs)
|
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (pcs) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15204501, filed by Resurgent Capital Services, L.P.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Marees, John) No Answer/Motion to Dismiss filed. Modified on 11/30/2021 (pcs). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
