Granada Developers, Inc. v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
| Granada Developers, Inc. |
| JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
| 1:2021cv24253 |
| December 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Federico A Moreno |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #7 Defendant's Unopposed Second Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Responses due by 2/9/2022 Signed by Judge Federico A. Moreno on 1/27/2022. (mti)
|
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint re #1 Complaint by JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.. Responses due by 2/9/2022 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Keller, Courtney) |
|
Filing 6
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #5 Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Response/Answer due 1/26/2022. Signed by Judge Federico A. Moreno on 1/7/2022. (mti)
|
| Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer to Complaint by JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.. Attorney Courtney M Keller added to party JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Keller, Courtney) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Granada Developers, Inc.. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. served on 12/22/2021, response/answer due 1/12/2022. (Garcia, Alejandro) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.. (jas) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Federico A. Moreno. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15220711, filed by Granada Developers, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Garcia, Alejandro) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Granada Developers, Inc. v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Granada Developers, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Alejandro Franklin Garcia |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. | |
| Represented By: | Courtney M Keller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
