Anderson v. Clemente Rodriguez et al
Plaintiff: Paris Anderson
Defendant: Antonio Clemente Rodriguez and Miami-Dade County
Case Number: 1:2021cv24438
Filed: December 23, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Chris M McAliley
Referring Judge: Kathleen M Williams
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #6 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant Miami-Dade County shall file its response to the Complaint no later than March 11, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chris M. McAliley on 2/16/2022. (rr00)
February 16, 2022 Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by Miami-Dade County. Attorney Zachary Edward Vosseler added to party Miami-Dade County(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Vosseler, Zachary)
January 27, 2022 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Miami-Dade County. (pcs)
January 26, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) Miami-Dade County by Paris Anderson re #1 Complaint filed by Paris Anderson (Sherris, Mary)
January 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER OF REFERRAL AND NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURES, referring case to Magistrate Judge Chris M. McAliley for all discovery disputes and non-dispositive pretrial motions. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 1/4/2022. See attached document for full details. (pcs)
December 23, 2021 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Kathleen M. Williams. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Chris M. McAliley is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (pcs)
December 23, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15272918, filed by Paris Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sherris, Mary)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Anderson v. Clemente Rodriguez et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Paris Anderson
Represented By: Mary Sherris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Antonio Clemente Rodriguez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Miami-Dade County
Represented By: Zachary Edward Vosseler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?