Ferraro Law Firm v. Bestwall LLC
| Ferraro Law Firm |
| Bestwall LLC |
| 1:2021mc24360 |
| December 16, 2021 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Jonathan Goodman |
| Federico A Moreno |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 23
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #21 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Attorney Garland S. Cassada ; granting #22 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Attorney Richard C. Worf. Signed by Judge Federico A. Moreno on 2/9/2022. (lfk)
|
| Filing 22 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Richard C. Worf. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-15370992 by Bestwall LLC. Responses due by 2/17/2022 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Certification of R. Worf), #2 Exhibit B (Text of Proposed Order))(Perez Soto, Ana Maria) |
| Filing 21 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Garland S. Cassada. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-15370894 by Bestwall LLC. Responses due by 2/17/2022 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Certification of G. Cassada), #2 Exhibit B (Text of Proposed Order))(Perez Soto, Ana Maria) |
|
Filing 20
PAPERLESS ORDER Setting Hearing on Motion #6 MOTION to Quash : A Zoom Motion Hearing set for 2/24/2022 at 03:30 PM in the Miami Division before Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman. All parties will need to download the Zoom App for cell phone, tablet (iPad), and for those using a desktop or a laptop equipped with a webcam to click on the meeting link and install the plug-in when prompted. T hen enter the Meeting ID and Password. Each participant needs to log in 10 minutes early, to make sure there are no glitches. The hearing will be conducted via ZOOM, as follows: Join ZoomGov Meeting https://www.zoomgov.com/j/1617227938?pwd=N212emVEUnpvV25aamprYVQzNHhGZz09. Meeting ID: 161 722 7938. Passcode: 039280. This Zoom hearing is the digital equivalent of an actual, in-court hearing, so counsel are expected to dress as though they are in an actual federal courtroom.Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman on 1/28/2022. (fbn)
|
|
Filing 19
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #17 Petitioner's Motion for Extension of Time to File its Reply to #13 Respondent's Response. Petitioner shall file its reply by February 22, 2022. The 18 hearing on Petitioner's Motion to Quash is rescheduled for February 24, 2022, at 3:30PM. A paperless Order containing the Zoom instructions and details will be issued separately. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman on 1/28/2022. (dw00)
|
|
Filing 18
PAPERLESS ORDER Setting Hearing on Motion #6 MOTION to Quash or Modify Subpoena : A Zoom Motion Hearing set for 2/8/2022 at 10:30 AM in the Miami Division before Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid. All parties will need to download the Zoom App for cell phone, tablet (iPad), and for those using a desktop or a laptop equipped with a webcam to click on the meeting link and install the plug-in when prompted. Then enter the Meeting ID and Password. Each participant needs to log in 10 minutes early, to make sure there are no glitches. The hearing will be conducted via ZOOM, as follows: Join ZoomGov Meeting https://www.zoomgov.com/j/1617227938?pwd=N212emVEUnpvV25aamprYVQzNHhGZz09. Meeting ID: 161 722 7938. Passcode: 039280. This Zoom hearing is the digital equivalent of an actual, in-court hearing, so counsel are expected to dress as though they are in an actual federal courtroom.Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman on 1/28/2022. (fbn)
|
| Filing 17 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #13 Response in Opposition to Motion, by Ferraro Law Firm. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time)(Burstyn, Sean) |
|
Filing 16
PAPERLESS ORDER re #6 MOTION to Quash filed by Ferraro Law Firm The Ferraro Law Firm has requested [ECF No. 6, p. 24] oral argument in connection with its motion to quash or modify a subpoena served on it. Bestwall LLC, the debtor in a Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding in North Carolina and the party who issued the subpoena, does not object [ECF No. 13, p. 21] to the requested hearing.The Undersigned will be scheduling a Zoom hearing on February 8, 2022, at 10:30 a.m. An Order containing the Zoom instructions and details will be issued separately.In the meantime, if the Ferraro Law Firm wishes to file an optional reply, then it shall do so February 3, 2022. No enlargements of time absent compelling circumstances bordering on a genuine emergency. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman on 1/28/2021. (JG)
|
| Filing 15 REFERRAL to Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman for Report and Recommendation per DE #14 . Motions referred to Judge Jonathan Goodman. (vjk) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER REFERRING #6 MOTION to Quash filed by Ferraro Law Firm. Motions referred to Judge Jonathan Goodman. Signed by Judge Federico A. Moreno on 1/26/2022. See attached document for full details. (lfk)
|
| Filing 13 RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Quash Or Modify Bestwall LLC's Subpoena Duces Tecum and Subpoena filed by Bestwall LLC. Replies due by 1/31/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit O, #16 Exhibit P)(Martinez-Cid, Jordi) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Christopher R.J. Pace on behalf of Bestwall LLC. Attorney Christopher R.J. Pace added to party Bestwall LLC(pty:res). (Pace, Christopher) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Christina Therese Mastrucci Lehn on behalf of Bestwall LLC. Attorney Christina Therese Mastrucci Lehn added to party Bestwall LLC(pty:res). (Mastrucci Lehn, Christina) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jordi CarloSantiago Martinez-Cid on behalf of Bestwall LLC. Attorney Jordi CarloSantiago Martinez-Cid added to party Bestwall LLC(pty:res). (Martinez-Cid, Jordi) |
|
Filing 9
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #7 Bestwall, LLC's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to the Ferraro Law Firm's Motion to Quash or Modify Subpoena Duces Tecum and Subpoena Ad Testificandum. Bestwall, LLC may file a response by 1/24/2022. Signed by Judge Federico A. Moreno on 1/18/2022. (mmd)
|
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Bestwall LLC identifying Corporate Parent Georgia-Pacific Holdings, LLC, Corporate Parent Koch Industries, Inc., Corporate Parent Georgia-Pacific Equity Holdings LLC, Corporate Parent Koch Renewable Resources, LLC for Bestwall LLC (Perez Soto, Ana Maria) |
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #6 MOTION to Quash by Bestwall LLC. Attorney Ana Maria Cristina Perez Soto added to party Bestwall LLC(pty:res). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Perez Soto, Ana Maria) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Quash by Ferraro Law Firm. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Affidavit Jagolinzer, #6 Text of Proposed Order)(Burstyn, Sean) |
|
Filing 5
PAPERLESS ORDER granting motion for extension of time to serve written objections to Bestwall, LLC's Subpoena Duces Tecum. The objections deadline is extended to January 3, 2022. Signed by Judge Federico A. Moreno on 12/20/2021. (mmd)
|
|
Filing 4
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #3 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Attorney Thomas W. Waldrep, Jr. Signed by Judge Federico A. Moreno on 12/20/2021. (mmd)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Thomas W. Waldrep, Jr.. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-15253986 by Ferraro Law Firm. Responses due by 12/30/2021 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice)(Burstyn, Sean) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Federico A. Moreno. (pcs) |
| Filing 1 Petition/Motion (Complaint) RE: Subpoena to Quash from Another District Seeking Unopposed Extension of Time to Respond. Filing fee $49.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15253727, filed by Ferraro Law Firm. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Subpoena Duces Tecum, #2 Exhibit Subpoena Ad Testificandum, #3 Text of Proposed Order, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Burstyn, Sean) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
