Rodriguez v. Warden, Northwest Florida Reception Center
| Dario Micheal Rodriguez, David, Darius and Mario |
| Warden, Northwest Florida Reception Center |
| 1:2022cv20152 |
| January 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Cecilia M Altonaga |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT. Case transferred from Florida Southern has been opened in Northern District of Florida as case 1:22-cv-00011, filed 01/20/2022. (jua) |
| SYSTEM ENTRY - Case 1:22-cv-20152 electronically transferred out to Florida Northern. (caw) |
Filing 3
ORDER directing the Clerk to transfer this case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida. Signed by Chief Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga on 1/12/2022. See attached document for full details. (ps1)
|
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Chief Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga. (daa) |
| Filing 1 EMERGENCY Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against Warden, Northwest Florida Reception Center. Filing fee $ 402.00 (Filing fee not paid/IFP Motion not filed), filed by Dario Micheal Rodriguez.(daa) |
| Civil Case Terminated, per #3 Order directing the Clerk to transfer this case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida. Closing Case. (ps1) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
