Zayas v. Credence Resource Management, LLC
Plaintiff: Willie Zayas
Defendant: Credence Resource Management, LLC
Case Number: 1:2022cv20170
Filed: January 12, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Joan A Lenard
Referring Judge: Lauren Fleischer Louis
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 PAPERLESS ORDER GRANTING #12 Joint Motion and Stipulation to Stay Proceedings. This action is hereby STAYED AND ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE pending the Eleventh Circuit's en banc decision in Hunstein v. Preferred Collection and Management Services, Inc., Case No. 19-14434-HH. Within fourteen days of the Eleventh Circuit's decision in Huntstein, the Parties shall file a Joint Motion to Reopen or other appropriate Motion/Stipulation. This entry constitutes the PAPERLESS ORDER in its entirety. Signed by Judge Joan A. Lenard on 2/1/2022. (gie)
February 1, 2022 Filing 12 Joint MOTION to Stay by Credence Resource Management, LLC. Responses due by 2/15/2022 (Schuette, Michael)
February 1, 2022 Filing 11 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Credence Resource Management, LLC (Schuette, Michael)
February 1, 2022 Filing 10 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint re the Notice of Removal by Credence Resource Management, LLC. (Schuette, Michael)
January 21, 2022 Filing 9 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Willie Zayas (Patti, Thomas)
January 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 PAPERLESS ORDER GRANTING #6 Defendant Credence Resource Management, LLC's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Defendant shall have until and including February 2, 2022 to respond to the Complaint. This entry constitutes the PAPERLESS ORDER in its entirety. Signed by Judge Joan A. Lenard on 1/20/2022. (gie)
January 19, 2022 Filing 8 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Lauren Fleischer Louis per DE #3 . (vjk)
January 19, 2022 Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), by Credence Resource Management, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Schuette, Michael)
January 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Order Setting Forth the Court's Policy on Motions for Extension or Stay of the Scheduling Order Deadlines. Signed by Judge Joan A. Lenard on 01/19/2022. See attached document for full details. (dp)
January 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER of Referral to Initial Mediation and Directing Plaintiff's Counsel to Submit (Within Fourteen Days) Proposed Order Scheduling Initial Mediation. Mediation Deadline 3/21/2022. Signed by Judge Joan A. Lenard on 01/19/2022. See attached document for full details. (Attachments: #1 Appendix) (dp)
January 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Order Referring Discovery Disputes and Certain Pretrial Motions to Magistrate Judge Lauren F. Louis; Directing Parties to File Certificates of Interested Parties; Directing Parties to File a Notice of Refiling And/or of Related Cases; Requiring Completion of Form Consenting to Jurisdiction by Magistrate Judge; Notice of Court Practice in Removal Actions; and Directing Parties to File a Joint Scheduling Report and Form. Signed by Judge Joan A. Lenard on 01/19/2022. See attached document for full details. (Attachments: #1 Appendix, #2 Appendix) (dp)
January 12, 2022 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Joan A. Lenard. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lauren F. Louis is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (mab)
January 12, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15313644, filed by Credence Resource Management, LLC. No Answer Filed/No Motion to Dismiss filed in State Court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 State Court Complaint, #3 Docket Sheet, #4 Exhibit A - State Court Documents)(Schuette, Michael) Text Modified on 1/13/2022 (mab).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Zayas v. Credence Resource Management, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Willie Zayas
Represented By: Jibrael Jarallah Said Hindi
Represented By: Thomas John Patti, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Credence Resource Management, LLC
Represented By: Michael Paul Schuette, Jr.
Represented By: Dayle Marie Van Hoose
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?