Brinis Fernandez v. Iadaresta et al
| Juan C. Brinis Fernandez |
| Michael Iadaresta, Thomas Fleischhaur, Clifford Beck, Jr., Daniel Colombo, Officer Matthew Ambre, Mishart Torres, Pedro Rodriguez, Steven Confessore and Gustavo Blacio |
| 1:2022cv20264 |
| January 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Darrin P Gayles |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915(e). Plaintiff's Complaint, [ECF No. #1 ], is DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, [ECF No. #3 ], is DENIED as moot. This case is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles on 3/8/2022. See attached document for full details. (daa)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE to the Court Re: Future Address Change by Juan C. Brinis Fernandez (pes) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Juan C. Brinis Fernandez. (daa) |
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. (daa) |
| Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against Matthew Ambre, Clifford Beck, Jr., Gustavo Blacio, Daniel Colombo, Steven Confessore, Thomas Fleischhaur, Michael Iadaresta, Pedro Rodriguez, Mishart Torres. Filing fee $ 402.00. IFP Filed, filed by Juan C. Brinis Fernandez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(daa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
