Williams v. THE BEAUTY PLACE, INC. et al
| TAMARA WAREKA p/k/a TAMARA WILLIAMS and Tamara Wareka |
| THE BEAUTY PLACE, INC. and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive |
| 1:2022cv20505 |
| February 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Jose E Martinez |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 0101 Copyright Infringement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 5/16/2022. See attached document for full details. (ail)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice by Tamara Wareka (Higbee, Melissa) |
| Filing 11 FORM AO 121 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. COPYRIGHT OFFICE (ail) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER ON NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT. The Clerk shall ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this case for statistical purposes only. This shall not affect the substantive rights of the parties. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 5/3/2022. See attached document for full details. (ail)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Settlement by THE BEAUTY PLACE, INC. (Suero, Cleo) |
|
Filing 8
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Complaint. Defendant shall respond on or before May 1, 2022. Absent exigent circumstances, this deadline will not be extended again. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 4/4/2022. (ah05)
|
| Reset Response/Answer Due Deadline per Order DE# 8 : THE BEAUTY PLACE, INC. response/answer due 5/1/2022. (drz) |
| Filing 7 Defendant's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint, by THE BEAUTY PLACE, INC.. Attorney Cleo Isabel Suero added to party THE BEAUTY PLACE, INC.(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Suero, Cleo) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Tamara Wareka. THE BEAUTY PLACE, INC. served on 3/11/2022, response/answer due 4/1/2022. (Higbee, Melissa) |
| Filing 5 FORM AO 121 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. COPYRIGHT OFFICE (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint) (bb) |
| Filing 4 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Alias Not Added. The Filer failed to add the alias information for the party(ies). The correction was made. It is not necessary to re-file this document. (bb) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to THE BEAUTY PLACE, INC. (bb) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Jose E. Martinez. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (bb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DOES 1 through 10 inclusive, THE BEAUTY PLACE, INC.. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15411475, filed by TAMARA WAREKA p/k/a TAMARA WILLIAMS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-D, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons for The Beauty Place, Inc.)(Higbee, Melissa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
