Melo v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
| Nicacio Melo |
| Scottsdale Insurance Company |
| 1:2022cv20613 |
| March 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Lauren Fleischer Louis |
| K Michael Moore |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Insurance Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 33
PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Parties' Joint Stipulation for Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice. #32 . Therein, the Parties stipulate to the dismissal of this matter with prejudice. Id. at 1. Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows a plaintiff to voluntarily dismiss a claim by filing a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Here, the Joint Stipulation is signed by all parties who have appeared. #32 at 1. Accordingly, UPON CONSIDERATION of the Joint Stipulation, the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the above-styled cause is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is INSTRUCTED to CLOSE this case. All pending motions, if any, are DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 9/21/2022. (rfr)
|
| Filing 32 Joint STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice by Scottsdale Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Young, Julia) Modified Text on 9/21/2022 (ls). |
| Filing 31 PAPERLESS NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE UPON NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Parties' Joint Notice of Settlement, which states that the Parties have settled this matter. #30 . The Parties are hereby directed to file a stipulation of dismissal of all claims signed by all parties pursuant to Rule 41(a), Fed. R. Civ. P., within thirty (30) days from the date of this Notice. If such papers are not filed within the time specified, this matter will be DISMISSED and the Court will be divested of jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement. The Clerk of Court is instructed to administratively CLOSE this case. All pending motions, if any, are DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 7/21/2022. (tgr) |
| Filing 30 NOTICE of Settlement by Scottsdale Insurance Company (Young, Julia) |
| Filing 29 NOTICE of Service of Proposal for Settlement/Offer of Judgment to Plaintiff by Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Young, Julia) |
| Filing 28 Notice of Supplemental Authority re #22 Response in Opposition to Motion, by Nicacio Melo (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A) (Baldwin, Matthew) |
| Filing 27 Clerks Notice to Filer re #26 Notice of Mediator Selection and/or Hearing. Mediator Not Added; ERROR - The Filer failed to add all parties from the complaint/petition/removal, etc. or the mediator. Filer is instructed to file a Notice of Entry of Parties Listed into CM/ECF and add the mediator. (jas) |
| Filing 26 NOTICE of Mediation Hearing. Elaine E. Feldman Mediation Hearing set for 09/12/2022 at 2:00 pm. (Salmon, John) |
|
Filing 25
PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Joint Motion to Excuse In-Person Attendance at Mediation. #24 . Therein, the Parties request permission from the Court to conduct mediation remotely to avoid travel time and expenses for both Parties and because "Covid-19 conditions remain." Id. at 2. When the Court referred this matter to mediation, it ordered that "[t]he physical presence of counsel and each party or representatives of each party with full authority to enter in a full and complete compromise and settlement is mandatory." (ECF No. 12). Accordingly, UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motion, the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion #24 is DENIED. The Parties shall conduct the mediation in person. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 5/2/2022. (soy)
|
| Filing 24 Joint MOTION to Excuse In Person Attendance at Mediation, and Embedded Memorandum of Law re 12 Order Referring Case to Mediation, by Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Young, Julia) |
| Filing 23 REPLY to Response to Motion re #20 MOTION TO DISMISS #15 Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Senate Analysis, #2 Exhibit B - House Analysis)(Young, Julia) |
| Filing 22 RESPONSE in Opposition re #20 MOTION TO DISMISS #15 Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Nicacio Melo. Replies due by 4/25/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Composite - State Trial Court Orders)(Baldwin, Matthew) |
| Filing 21 Notice of Entry of Parties Listed on 19 Clerks Notice of Docket Correction and Instruction to Filer - Attorney, into CM/ECF. NOTE: New Filer(s) will appear twice, since they are also a new party in the case. New Filer(s)/Party(s): Rosa Rodriguez. (Baldwin, Matthew) |
| Filing 20 MOTION TO DISMISS #15 Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Scottsdale Insurance Company. Responses due by 4/18/2022 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Art Deco Order, #2 Exhibit B - Urra Order, #3 Exhibit C - Ludwig Order, #4 Exhibit D - Smigiel Order, #5 Exhibit E - Gibson Order, #6 Exhibit F - Cimbalnik Order, #7 Exhibit G - Sweeney Order, #8 Exhibit H - Mazur Order, #9 Exhibit I - Metayer Order, #10 Exhibit J - Pirozzi Order, #11 Exhibit K - Willihoite Order)(Young, Julia) |
| Filing 19 Clerks Notice to Filer re #18 Notice (Other). Mediator Not Added; ERROR - The Filer failed to add all parties from the complaint/petition/removal, etc. or the mediator. Filer is instructed to file a Notice of Entry of Parties Listed into CM/ECF and add the mediator. (jas) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE by Nicacio Melo Mediator Selection (Baldwin, Matthew) |
| Filing 17 Plaintiff's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by Nicacio Melo identifying Other Affiliate Rochelle Martin, Other Affiliate Helping Neighbors Claim Adjusters, Other Affiliate Alex Graciano for Nicacio Melo (Baldwin, Matthew) |
|
Filing 16
PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiff Nicacio Melo's filing of the Amended Complaint. #15 . The amended complaint moots Defendant Scottsdale Insurance Company's Motion to Dismiss #6 . Accordingly, UPON CONSIDERATION of the amended complaint, the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss #6 is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 3/28/2022. (soy)
|
| Filing 15 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Nicacio Melo, filed by Nicacio Melo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Renewal Certificate, #2 Exhibit Estimate)(Baldwin, Matthew) |
| Filing 14 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by Scottsdale Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, Other Affiliate Rochelle Martin, Other Affiliate Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker, LLP, Other Affiliate Julia Young, Other Affiliate Derrick Natal, Other Affiliate Joanis Ruiz, Other Affiliate Vargas Gonzalez Baldwin Delombard, LLP, Other Affiliate Matthew L. Baldwin, Other Affiliate Helping Neighbors Claim Adjusters, Other Affiliate Alex Graciano for Scottsdale Insurance Company (Young, Julia) |
| Filing 13 Notice of NO Pending, Refiled, Related or Similar Actions by Scottsdale Insurance Company (Young, Julia) |
|
Filing 12
PAPERLESS ORDER OF REFERRAL TO MEDIATION. Trial having been set in this matter for the two-week trial period beginning December 5, 2022, at 9:00 a.m. pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure and Rule 16.2 of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. All parties are required to participate in mediation. The mediation shall be completed no later than eighty (80) days before the scheduled trial date. 2. Plaintiff's counsel, or another attorney agreed upon by all counsel of record and any unrepresented parties, shall be responsible for scheduling the mediation conference. The parties are encouraged to avail themselves of the services of any mediator on the List of Certified Mediators, maintained in the office of the Clerk of this Court, but may select any other mediator. The parties shall agree upon a mediator and file a Notice of Mediator Selection within fifteen (15) days from the date of this Order. If there is no agreement, lead counsel shall file a request for the Clerk of Court to appoint a mediator in writing within fifteen (15) days from the date of this Order, and the Clerk shall designate a mediator from the List of Certified Mediators. Designation shall be made on a blind rotation basis. 3. The parties shall agree upon a place, date, and time for mediation convenient to the mediator, counsel of record, and unrepresented parties and file a Notice of Scheduling Mediation no later than one hundred and ten (110) days prior to the scheduled trial date. If the parties cannot agree to a place, date, and time for the mediation, they may motion the Court for an order dictating the place, date, and time. 4. The physical presence of counsel and each party or representatives of each party with full authority to enter in a full and complete compromise and settlement is mandatory. The mediation shall take place in person absent good cause shown by the parties. If insurance is involved, an adjuster with authority up to the policy limits or the most recent demand, whichever is lower, shall attend. 5. All discussions, representations and statements made at the mediation conference shall be confidential and privileged. 6. At least ten (10) days prior to the mediation date, all parties shall present to the mediator a brief written summary of the case identifying issues to be resolved. Copies of those summaries shall be served on all other parties. 7. The Court may impose sanctions against parties and/or counsel who do not comply with the attendance or settlement authority requirements herein, or who otherwise violate the terms of this Order. The mediator shall report non-attendance and may recommend imposition of sanctions by the Court for non-attendance. 8. The mediator shall be compensated in accordance with the standing order of the Court entered pursuant to Rule 16.2.B.6, or on such basis as may be agreed to in writing by the parties and the mediator selected by the parties. The cost of mediation shall be shared equally by the parties unless otherwise ordered by the Court. All payments shall be remitted to the mediator within 30 days of the date of the bill. Notice to the mediator of cancellation or settlement prior to the scheduled mediation conference must be given at least two (2) full business days in advance. Failure to do so will result in imposition of a fee for one hour. 9. If a full or partial settlement is reached in this case, counsel shall promptly notify the Court of the settlement in accordance with Local Rule 16.2.F, by filing a notice of settlement signed by the counsel of record within ten (10) days of the mediation conference. Thereafter, the parties shall forthwith submit an appropriate pleading concluding the case. 10. Within five (5) days following the mediation conference, the mediator shall file a Mediation Report indicating whether all required parties were present. The report shall also indicate whether the case settled (in full or in part), was continued with the consent of the parties, or whether the mediator declared an impasse. 11. If mediation is not conducted, the case may be stricken from the trial calendar, and other sanctions may be imposed. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 3/24/2022. (soy)
|
|
Filing 11
PAPERLESS ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL IN MIAMI. This case is now set for trial commencing the two-week trial period of December 5, 2022, at 9 a.m. in Courtroom 13-1, (thirteenth floor) United States Courthouse, 400 North Miami Avenue, Miami, Florida. All parties are directed to report to the calendar call on December 1, 2022, at 2 p.m., at which time all matters relating to the scheduled trial date may be brought to the attention of the Court. A final pretrial conference as provided for by Rule 16, Fed. R. Civ. P., and Rule 16.1(C), S.D. Fla. L.R., is scheduled for November 22, 2022, at 11 a.m. A bilateral pretrial stipulation and all other pretrial preparations shall be completed NO LATER THAN FIVE DAYS PRIOR TO THE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. All motions to amend the pleadings or to join additional parties must be filed by the later of forty-five (45) days after the date of entry of this Order, or forty-five (45) days after the first responsive pleading by the last responding defendant. Any and all pretrial motions, including motions for summary judgment, Daubert motions, and motions in limine must be filed no later than eighty (80) days prior to the trial date. Responses to summary judgment motions must be filed no later than fourteen (14) days after service of the motion, and replies in support of the motion must be filed no later than seven (7) days after service of the response, with both deadlines computed as specified in Rule 6, Fed. R. Civ. P. Each party is limited to one Daubert motion. If all evidentiary issues cannot be addressed in a 20-page memorandum, the parties must file for leave to exceed the page limit. Each party is also limited to one motion in limine (other than Daubert motions). If all evidentiary issues cannot be addressed in a 20-page memorandum, the parties must file for leave to exceed the page limit. Rule 26(a)(2) expert disclosures shall be completed one hundred thirty (130) days prior to the date of trial. All discovery, including expert discovery, shall be completed one hundred (100) days prior to the date of trial. The failure to engage in discovery pending settlement negotiations shall not be grounds for continuance of the trial date. All exhibits must be pre-marked, and a typewritten exhibit list setting forth the number and description of each exhibit must be submitted at the time of trial. Plaintiff's exhibits shall be marked numerically with the letter "P" as a prefix. Defendant's exhibits shall be marked numerically with the letter "D" as a prefix. For a jury trial, counsel shall prepare and submit proposed jury instructions to the Court. The Parties shall submit their proposed jury instructions and verdict form jointly, although they do not need to agree on each proposed instruction. Where the parties do not agree on a proposed instruction, that instruction shall be set forth in bold type. Instructions proposed only by a plaintiff should be underlined. Instructions proposed only by a defendant should be italicized. Every instruction must be supported by citation to authority. The parties should use the Eleventh Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions for Civil Cases as a guide, including the directions to counsel contained therein. The parties shall jointly file their proposed jury instructions via CM/ECF, and shall also submit their proposed jury instructions to the Court via e-mail at moore@flsd.uscourts.gov in WordPerfect or Word format. For a non-jury trial, the parties shall prepare and submit to the Court proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law fully supported by the evidence, which counsel expects the trial to develop, and fully supported by citations to law. The proposed jury instructions or the proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law shall be submitted to the Court no later than five (5) business days prior to the scheduled trial date. Pursuant to Administrative Order 2016-70 of the Southern District of Florida and consistent with the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit's Local Rules and Internal Operating Procedures, within three days of the conclusion of a trial or other proceeding, parties must file via CM/ECF electronic versions of documentary exhibits admitted into evidence, including photographs of non-documentary physical exhibits. The Parties are directed to comply with each of the requirements set forth in Administrative Order 2016-70 unless directed otherwise by the Court. THE FILING BY COUNSEL OF A "NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY" BY MOTION OR OTHERWISE IS NOT PROVIDED FOR UNDER THE LOCAL RULES AND SHALL NOT BE PRESUMED TO ALTER OR MODIFY THE COURT'S SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 3/24/2022. (soy)
|
| Filing 10 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 16.1 by Scottsdale Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Scheduling Order)(Young, Julia) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Matthew Lee Baldwin on behalf of Nicacio Melo. Attorney Matthew Lee Baldwin added to party Nicacio Melo(pty:pla). (Baldwin, Matthew) |
| Filing 8 Notice of Supplemental Authority re #6 MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Scottsdale Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Art Deco Order) (Young, Julia) |
|
Filing 7
PAPERLESS ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS #6 . THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Defendant Scottsdale Insurance Company's Motion to Dismiss. #6 . Therein, Defendant moves to dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. See generally id. Without expressing any views as to the Motions merits, the Court affords Plaintiff an opportunity to cure the purported pleading defects by granting Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1)(B). Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED to either amend the Complaint #1 on or before March 29, 2022, or respond to the Motion to Dismiss #6 on or before March 22, 2022. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 3/9/2022. (soy)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Scottsdale Insurance Company. Responses due by 3/22/2022 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Ludwig Order, #2 Exhibit B - Smigiel Order, #3 Exhibit C - Gibson Order, #4 Exhibit D - Cimbalnik Order, #5 Exhibit E - Sweeney Order, #6 Exhibit F - Senate Analysis, #7 Exhibit G - House Analysis)(Young, Julia) |
|
Filing 5
PAPERLESS ORDER REFERRING PRETRIAL DISCOVERY MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE LAUREN F. LOUIS. PURSUANT to 28 U.S.C. 636 and the Magistrate Judge Rules of the Local Rules of the Southern District of Florida, the above-captioned Cause is referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lauren F. Louis to take all necessary and proper action as required by law with respect to any and all pretrial discovery matters. Any motion affecting deadlines set by the Court's Scheduling Order is excluded from this referral, unless specifically referred by separate Order. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall comply with Magistrate Judge Lauren F. Louis's discovery procedures. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 3/2/2022. (tgr)
|
|
Filing 4
PAPERLESS PRETRIAL ORDER. THIS ORDER has been entered upon the filing of a Notice of Removal. Counsel for the removing party is hereby ORDERED to forward a copy of this Order to all other parties. It is further ORDERED that S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1 shall apply to this case and the parties shall hold a scheduling conference within twenty (20) days of the date of this Order. Within ten (10) days of the scheduling conference, counsel shall file a Joint Scheduling Report. The report shall indicate the proposed month and year for the trial and the estimated number of days required for trial. The scheduling conference may be held via telephone. At the conference, the parties shall comply with the following agenda that the Court adopts from S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1: (1) Documents (S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1.B.1 and 2) The parties shall determine the procedure for exchanging a copy of, or a description by category and location of, all documents and other evidence that is reasonably available and that a party expects to offer, or may offer, if the need arises. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(B). (A) Documents include computations of the nature and extent of any category of damages claimed by the disclosing party unless the computations are privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(C). (B) Documents include insurance agreements which may be at issue with the satisfaction of the judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(D). (2) List of Witnesses - The parties shall exchange the name, address, and telephone number of each individual known to have knowledge of the facts supporting the material allegations of the pleading filed by the party. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(A). The parties have a continuing obligation to disclose this information. (3) Discussions and Deadlines (S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1.B.2) - The parties shall discuss the nature and basis of their claims and defenses and the possibility of a prompt settlement or resolution of the case. Failure to comply with this Order or to exchange the information listed above may result in sanctions and/or the exclusion of documents or witnesses at the time of trial. S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1.I. Failure of counsel to file a joint scheduling report may result in remand or dismissal, default, and the imposition of other sanctions including attorney's fees and costs. The filing of a motion to dismiss, or other motion, does not toll the time for filing a joint scheduling report. Counsel for the non-removing party must file a motion to remand the case on the basis of any defect other than lack of subject matter jurisdiction within thirty (30) days after the filing of the Notice of Removal. The parties are hereby on notice that this Court requires all filings to be formatted in 12 point Times New Roman font and double spaced, including any footnotes, with one-inch margins on all sides. Failure to follow these formatting guidelines may result in the filing being stricken, any opposing filing being granted by default, and the imposition of other sanctions, including attorney's fees and costs. Pursuant to Administrative Order 2016-70 of the Southern District of Florida and consistent with the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit's Local Rules and Internal Operating Procedures, within three days of the conclusion of a trial or other proceeding, parties must file via CM/ECF electronic versions of documentary exhibits admitted into evidence, including photographs of non-documentary physical exhibits. The Parties are directed to comply with each of the requirements set forth in Administrative Order 2016-70 unless directed otherwise by the Court. Telephonic appearances are not permitted for any purpose. Upon reaching a settlement in this matter the parties are instructed to notify the Court by telephone and to file a Notice of Settlement within twenty-four (24) hours. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 3/2/2022. (tgr)
|
| Filing 3 Bar Letter re: Admissions sent to attorney Joanis Ruiz, mailing date March 1, 2022, (pt) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge K. Michael Moore. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lauren F. Louis is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jas) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15436547, filed by SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - State Court Documents, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - Email from Pla Counsell, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C - Estimate by Helping Neighbors Claim Adjusters, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D - Property Appraisal Searches, #5 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Young, Julia) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Melo v. Scottsdale Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Nicacio Melo | |
| Represented By: | Joanis B. Ruiz |
| Represented By: | Matthew Lee Baldwin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Scottsdale Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Julia Grimke Young |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
