Ariza v. Hugo Boss Fashions, Inc.
| Victor Ariza |
| Hugo Boss Fashions, Inc. |
| 1:2022cv20764 |
| March 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Jose E Martinez |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER on Notice of Settlement. Closing Case. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 4/27/2022. See attached document for full details. (pes) Modified text/status per Chambers on 4/28/2022 (sk).
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Settlement by Hugo Boss Fashions, Inc. (Rivera, Kimberly) |
|
Filing 7
PAPERLESS ORDER GRANTING #6 Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Defendant has until and including Wednesday, April 27, 2022, to file its response to #1 the Complaint. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 4/5/2022. (jea)
|
| Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by Hugo Boss Fashions, Inc.. Attorney Kimberly Rae Rivera added to party Hugo Boss Fashions, Inc.(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Rivera, Kimberly) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Victor Ariza. Hugo Boss Fashions, Inc. served on 3/16/2022, response/answer due 4/6/2022. (Hannah, Roderick) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Hugo Boss Fashions, Inc. (drz) |
| Filing 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Incorrect case opening information. The Filer selected the incorrect Cause of Action when filing. The correction was made. It is not necessary to re-file this document. (drz) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Jose E. Martinez. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (drz) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Hugo Boss Fashions, Inc.. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15474709, filed by Victor Ariza. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Summon(s))(Hannah, Roderick) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ariza v. Hugo Boss Fashions, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Victor Ariza | |
| Represented By: | Roderick Victor Hannah |
| Represented By: | Pelayo M. Duran |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Hugo Boss Fashions, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Kimberly Rae Rivera |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
