Savir v. ARS NATIONAL SERVICES INC.,
Plaintiff: Eyal Savir
Defendant: ARS NATIONAL SERVICES INC.,
Case Number: 1:2022cv20797
Filed: March 16, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Jose E Martinez
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER ON NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT. Closing Case. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 4/29/2022. See attached document for full details. (mee)
April 29, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE of Settlement Pending by ARS NATIONAL SERVICES INC., (Burgess, Robert)
April 28, 2022 Filing 8 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by ARS NATIONAL SERVICES INC.,. (Burgess, Robert)
April 25, 2022 Filing 7 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Eyal Savir. ARS NATIONAL SERVICES INC., served on 3/23/2022, response/answer due 4/28/2022. (Zeig, Justin)
April 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 PAPERLESS ORDER granting in part #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Defendant shall have through and including April 28, 2022 to respond to the Complaint. No further extensions will be granted absent exigent circumstances. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 4/12/2022. (cvl)
April 11, 2022 Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by ARS NATIONAL SERVICES INC.,. (Burgess, Robert)
April 11, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Robert Carter Burgess on behalf of ARS NATIONAL SERVICES INC.,. Attorney Robert Carter Burgess added to party ARS NATIONAL SERVICES INC.,(pty:dft). (Burgess, Robert)
March 17, 2022 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to ARS NATIONAL SERVICES INC.,. (cds)
March 16, 2022 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Jose E. Martinez. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (cds)
March 16, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ARS NATIONAL SERVICES INC.,. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15482993, filed by Eyal Savir. (Attachments: #1 Errata Exhibit A - Letter, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summon(s))(Zeig, Justin)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Savir v. ARS NATIONAL SERVICES INC.,
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eyal Savir
Represented By: Justin E. Zeig
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ARS NATIONAL SERVICES INC.,
Represented By: Robert Carter Burgess
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?