Carrillo v. King Creek Hair Design Unisex Corporation
| Yusimi Carrillo |
| King Creek Hair Design Unisex Corporation |
| 1:2022cv21019 |
| April 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Marcia G Cooke |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER GRANTING #8 Plaintiff's Motion for Approval of Settlement of FLSA Claims and Dismissal With Prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Melissa Damian on 5/19/2022. See attached document for full details. (oco)
|
|
Filing 15
Joint Notice and Consent to Jurisdiction US Magistrate Judge signed by all parties . Filed by Yusimi Carrillo (Saavedra, Nathaly)
|
|
Filing 14
PAPERLESS Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Melissa Damian: ZOOM Fairness Hearing held on 5/19/2022. Order to follow. Total time in court: 10 minutes. Attorney Appearance(s): Nathaly Saavedra and Michael Anthony Pancier (Digital MD_ZOOM_05_19_2022/DAR_2:01:27) (jbs)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Michael Anthony Pancier on behalf of King Creek Hair Design Unisex Corporation. Attorney Michael Anthony Pancier added to party King Creek Hair Design Unisex Corporation(pty:dft). (Pancier, Michael)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER GRANTING #11 Plaintiff's Motion to Continue Fairness Hearing. The Fairness Hearing is reset for 5/19/2022 at 2:00 PM in the Miami Division before Magistrate Judge Melissa Damian. Signed by Magistrate Judge Melissa Damian on 5/16/2022. See attached document for full details. (oco)
|
|
Filing 11
Plaintiff's MOTION to Continue re 10 Order Setting/Cancelling Hearing, by Yusimi Carrillo. Responses due by 5/31/2022 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Saavedra, Nathaly)
|
|
Filing 10
PAPERLESS ORDER Setting Fairness Hearing. Please take notice that the Court will hold a Fairness Hearing via Zoom on 5/17/2022 at 11:00 AM in the Miami Division before Magistrate Judge Melissa Damian. The Court will provide Zoom information to all parties upon the entry of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Melissa Damian on 4/29/2022. (oco)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER REFERRING #8 Plaintiff's MOTION for Settlement Approval and Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice filed by Yusimi Carrillo. Motions referred to Judge Melissa Damian. Signed by Judge Marcia G. Cooke on 4/27/2022. See attached document for full details. (cds)
|
|
Filing 8
Plaintiff's MOTION for Settlement Approval and Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice by Yusimi Carrillo. Responses due by 5/10/2022 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Settlement Agreement, #2 Exhibit B - Attorneys' Time Records, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Saavedra, Nathaly)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE AND REQUIRING PARTIES TO SUBMIT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Signed by Judge Marcia G. Cooke on 4/20/2022. See attached document for full details. (cds)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Settlement by Yusimi Carrillo (Saavedra, Nathaly)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER OF REFERRAL to Magistrate Judge Melissa Damian for Settlement AND ORDER REGARDING COURT PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES. Signed by Judge Marcia G. Cooke on 4/7/2022. See attached document for full details. (cds)
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Yusimi Carrillo. King Creek Hair Design Unisex Corporation served on 4/5/2022, response/answer due 4/26/2022. (Saavedra, Nathaly)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued as to King Creek Hair Design Unisex Corporation. (cds)
|
|
Filing 2
Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Marcia G. Cooke. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Melissa Damian is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (cds)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against King Creek Hair Design Unisex Corporation. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15530043, filed by Yusimi Carrillo. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Saavedra, Nathaly)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Carrillo v. King Creek Hair Design Unisex Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Yusimi Carrillo | |
| Represented By: | Nathaly Saavedra |
| Represented By: | Juan J. Perez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: King Creek Hair Design Unisex Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Michael Anthony Pancier |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
