Lahens v. Le Petit Papillon Montessori Corporation et al
| Manuel Paneque Lahens |
| Le Petit Papillon Montessori Corporation and Damarys Corso |
| 1:2022cv21038 |
| April 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| James Lawrence King |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 0002 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Complaint FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM as to Counts II and III by Damarys Corso, Le Petit Papillon Montessori Corporation. Responses due by 6/9/2022 (Amit, Adi)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER Granting #11 Unopposed Motion to Set Aside Default. Signed by Senior Judge James Lawrence King on 5/12/2022. See attached document for full details. (cds)
|
|
Filing 11
Unopposed MOTION to Set Aside Default by Damarys Corso, Le Petit Papillon Montessori Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Sworn Declaration of Damarys Corso, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Amit, Adi)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Adi Amit on behalf of Damarys Corso, Le Petit Papillon Montessori Corporation. Attorney Adi Amit added to party Damarys Corso(pty:dft), Attorney Adi Amit added to party Le Petit Papillon Montessori Corporation(pty:dft). (Amit, Adi)
|
|
Filing 9
(VACATED DE#12 ) Clerks Entry of Default as to Le Petit Papillon Montessori Corporation, Damarys Corso - Motions Terminated: #8 Motion for Clerks Entry of Default Signed by DEPUTY CLERK on 5/3/2022. (cds) Modified Text on 5/12/2022 (cds).
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION for Clerks Entry of Default as to All Defendants by Manuel Paneque Lahens. (Rosenberg, R)
|
|
Filing 7
SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Manuel Paneque Lahens. Damarys Corso served on 4/11/2022, response/answer due 5/2/2022. (Rosenberg, R)
|
|
Filing 6
SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Manuel Paneque Lahens. Le Petit Papillon Montessori Corporation served on 4/11/2022, response/answer due 5/2/2022. (Rosenberg, R)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE by Manuel Paneque Lahens re #4 Order of Estimated Length of Trial (Rosenberg, R)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Estimated Length of Trial re #1 Complaint filed by Manuel Paneque Lahens Signed by Senior Judge James Lawrence King on 4/7/2022. See attached document for full details. (jw)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued as to Damarys Corso, Le Petit Papillon Montessori Corporation. (pcs)
|
|
Filing 2
Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Senior Judge James Lawrence King. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Melissa Damian is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (pcs)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15537539, filed by Manuel Paneque Lahens. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Summon(s))(Rosenberg, R)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
