Hannula v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
| Eric Hannula |
| Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company |
| 1:2022cv21073 |
| April 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Jonathan Goodman |
| Robert N Scola |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 16.1 by Eric Hannula (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Jessup, Stephen) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Change of Address, Email or Law Firm Name by Stephen Francis Jessup (Jessup, Stephen) |
| Filing 7 Defendant's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company (Suarez, Tanya) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company. Attorney Tanya Irene Suarez added to party Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company(pty:dft). (Suarez, Tanya) |
Filing 5
MAGISTRATE JUDGE GOODMAN'S DISCOVERY PROCEDURES ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman on 4/20/2022. See attached document for full details. (fbn)
|
|
Filing 4
Order Requiring Discovery and Scheduling Conference and Order Referring Discovery Matters to the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr on 4/19/2022. See attached document for full details. (lbc)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company. (jas) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15544264, filed by Eric Hannula. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s) Summons)(Jessup, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hannula v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Eric Hannula | |
| Represented By: | Stephen Francis Jessup |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Tanya Irene Suarez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
