Muldrow v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
| Krishaun Muldrow |
| Unum Life Insurance Company of America |
| 1:2022cv21107 |
| April 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Darrin P Gayles |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Plaintiff's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by Krishaun Muldrow (Dabdoub, Edward) |
Filing 11
PAPERLESS ORDER REQUIRING JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT AND PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER. Pursuant to S.D. Fla. Local Rule 16.1, on or before June 10, 2022, the parties shall prepare and file a Joint Scheduling Report, as well as Certificates of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure Statements.The parties shall also file a Proposed Scheduling Order, adhering to the format and guidance of the attached form. If the parties deviate in any way from that format and guidance, they shall contemporaneously submit a written explanation, which provides their purported justification for each and every deviation. If the parties fail to submit such written explanation, the Court may enter a Scheduling Order that does not take into account the parties' proposed dates.Failure to comply with this Order shall be grounds for dismissal without prejudice and without further notice. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (bhy)
|
| Filing 10 Notice of NO Pending, Refiled, Related or Similar Actions by Unum Life Insurance Company of America (Tolton, William) |
| Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Unum Life Insurance Company of America identifying Corporate Parent Unum Group d/b/a Unum Group Corporation (in the State of Florida) for Unum Life Insurance Company of America (Tolton, William) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by Unum Life Insurance Company of America. (Tolton, William) |
|
Filing 7
PAPERLESS ORDER granting Defendant's #6 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading. Defendant shall file its responsive pleading on or before May 24, 2022. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (bhy)
|
| Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by Unum Life Insurance Company of America. Attorney William Jeremiah Tolton, III added to party Unum Life Insurance Company of America(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Tolton, William) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. Unless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion shall be double-spaced in Times New Roman 12-point typeface. Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the striking of the motion or dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (bhy) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Krishaun Muldrow. Unum Life Insurance Company of America served on 4/13/2022, response/answer due 5/4/2022. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Dabdoub, Edward) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Unum Life Insurance Company of America. (mee) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (mee) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DISABILITY BENEFITS against Unum Life Insurance Company of America. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15549681, filed by Krishaun Muldrow. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Dabdoub, Edward) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Muldrow v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Krishaun Muldrow | |
| Represented By: | Edward Philip Dabdoub |
| Represented By: | Zoe Hope Vayer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Unum Life Insurance Company of America | |
| Represented By: | William Jeremiah Tolton, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
