Pinero v. E & W DEVELOPMENT, LLP et al
Emilio Pinero |
E & W DEVELOPMENT, LLP and QUE BARATO STORES, INC. doing business as NOOO QUE BARATO |
1:2022cv21139 |
April 14, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Cecilia M Altonaga |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER granting in part #11 Defendant, Que Barato Stores, Inc.'s Consent Motion to Extend Time to File Joint Scheduling Report. The deadline for the parties to file a joint scheduling report, certificates of interested parties, and corporate disclosure statements is June 21, 2022. Signed by Chief Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga on 6/7/2022. See attached document for full details. (wc) |
Filing 11 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to file Joint Scheduling Report re #7 Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report by QUE BARATO STORES, INC.. Responses due by 6/21/2022 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Hoffman, John) |
Filing 10 Defendant's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by QUE BARATO STORES, INC. (Hoffman, John) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by John Davis Hoffman on behalf of QUE BARATO STORES, INC.. Attorney John Davis Hoffman added to party QUE BARATO STORES, INC.(pty:dft). (Hoffman, John) |
Filing 8 ORDER that all Defendants shall submit a single, combined response or separate answers within the time allowed for the last-served Defendant to respond. Signed by Chief Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga See attached document for full details. (ps1) |
Filing 7 Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report and Certificates of Interested Parties by 6/7/2022. Signed by Chief Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga on 5/21/2022. See attached document for full details. (ps1) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Emilio Pinero. QUE BARATO STORES, INC. served on 5/10/2022, response/answer due 5/31/2022. (Goldstein, Glenn) |
Filing 5 ORDER requiring service be perfected by 7/13/2022. Signed by Chief Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga on 5/4/2022. See attached document for full details. (ps1) |
Filing 4 Plaintiff's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Emilio Pinero (Goldstein, Glenn) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to E & W DEVELOPMENT, LLP, QUE BARATO STORES, INC.. (cds) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Chief Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (cds) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against E & W DEVELOPMENT, LLP, QUE BARATO STORES, INC.. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15559298, filed by Emilio Pinero. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Summon(s))(Goldstein, Glenn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.