Samuels v. Papillon et al
Ronald Samuels |
Frank Papillon and Centurion of Florida |
1:2022cv21378 |
May 3, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Aileen M Cannon |
Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 MOTION to Alter or Amend the Judgment re #3 Order Dismissing/Closing Case,, by Ronald Samuels. Responses due by 7/14/2022. (cds) |
Filing 3 ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Complaint is dismissed WITHOUT PREJUDICE. If Plaintiff decides to initiate a new case by re-filing the Complaint in this Court, he must either pay the $402 filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis along with: a) A certificate concerning his/her prison bank account completed by an officer of the institution and b) A copy of his/her prison/jail account for the six-month period preceding the filing of the complaint, in accordance with the above quoted statute. This must be a full statement of all deposits and withdrawals, not just a summary. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 6/3/2022. See attached document for full details. (daa) |
Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge Aileen M. Cannon. (daa) |
Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against Centurion of Florida, Frank Papillon. Filing fee $ 402.00 (Filing fee not paid/IFP Motion not filed), filed by Ronald Samuels.(daa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.