Lastra v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Beatriz Lastra
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Case Number: 1:2022cv21442
Filed: May 10, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Lauren Fleischer Louis
Referring Judge: K Michael Moore
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 7, 2022 Filing 8 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed by Beatriz Lastra. Commissioner of Social Security Administration served on 6/7/2022, response/answer due 8/8/2022. (Berger, Erik)
June 6, 2022 Filing 7 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed U.S. Attorney General served on 6/1/2022, response/answer due 8/1/2022. (ebz)
May 24, 2022 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (scn)
May 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #3 Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepayment of Fees or Costs. Granting to the extent that Plaintiff need not prepay even a partial filing fee in this case, or to prepay costs such as for service of process. USM Service ordered. Summonses provided for issuance by Clerk for USM Service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lauren Fleischer Louis on 5/20/2022. See attached document for full details. (nce)
May 10, 2022 Filing 4 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Summons(es) cannot be issued. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is pending (nan)
May 10, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Beatriz Lastra. (nan)
May 10, 2022 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge K. Michael Moore and Magistrate Judge Lauren Fleischer Louis. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lauren F. Louis is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pursuant to the Clerks directive of this cause, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. (nan)
May 10, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security. Filing fees $ 402.00. IFP Filed, filed by Beatriz Lastra. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 In Forma Pauperis)Case restricted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. (Berger, Erik)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lastra v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Beatriz Lastra
Represented By: Erik William Berger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Represented By: Noticing Social Security US Attorney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?