Lastra v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Beatriz Lastra |
Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
1:2022cv21442 |
May 10, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Lauren Fleischer Louis |
K Michael Moore |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed by Beatriz Lastra. Commissioner of Social Security Administration served on 6/7/2022, response/answer due 8/8/2022. (Berger, Erik) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed U.S. Attorney General served on 6/1/2022, response/answer due 8/1/2022. (ebz) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (scn) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting #3 Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepayment of Fees or Costs. Granting to the extent that Plaintiff need not prepay even a partial filing fee in this case, or to prepay costs such as for service of process. USM Service ordered. Summonses provided for issuance by Clerk for USM Service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lauren Fleischer Louis on 5/20/2022. See attached document for full details. (nce) |
Filing 4 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Summons(es) cannot be issued. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is pending (nan) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Beatriz Lastra. (nan) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge K. Michael Moore and Magistrate Judge Lauren Fleischer Louis. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lauren F. Louis is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pursuant to the Clerks directive of this cause, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. (nan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security. Filing fees $ 402.00. IFP Filed, filed by Beatriz Lastra. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 In Forma Pauperis)Case restricted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. (Berger, Erik) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Lastra v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Beatriz Lastra | |
Represented By: | Erik William Berger |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
Represented By: | Noticing Social Security US Attorney |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.