Patterson v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
| Barrington Patterson |
| Commissioner of Social Security and Commissioner Social Security Administration |
| 1:2022cv21528 |
| May 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Chris M McAliley |
| Kathleen M Williams |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Summons Issued as to Commissioner Social Security Administration. (cqs) |
| Filing 10 SUPPLEMENT Amended Summons Commissioner Social Security Administration by Barrington Patterson (Liebenhaut, Matthew) |
| Filing 9 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Summons(es) cannot be issued. The party(ies) on the summons(es) does not match the initiating documents. #3 Commissioner Social Security Administration. (cds) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (cds) |
Filing 7
ORDER Granting #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. USM Service Ordered and Summonses NOT provided for USM Service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chris M. McAliley on 5/27/2022. See attached document for full details. (cds)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE AND ORDER REQUIRING COMPLETION OF FORM REGARDING CONSENT TO JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 5/23/2022. See attached document for full details. (cds)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Barrington Patterson. (Attachments: #1 Supplement USM 285 Attorney General, #2 Supplement USM 285 Social Security Administration, #3 Supplement USM285 US Attorney)(Liebenhaut, Matthew) |
| Filing 4 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Filing fees not paid. Filer is instructed to file a Notice of Compliance of Filing Fee, and electronically pay the correct fees of $402.00 within 24 hours of this notice. (swr) |
| Filing 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Venue on the Civil Cover Sheet does not match the initiating document. The Clerks Office confirmed Miami-Dade (Office - Miami) as the county with the filer. It is not necessary to re-file this document. (swr) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Kathleen M. Williams and Magistrate Judge Chris M. McAliley. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Chris M. McAliley is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pursuant to the Clerks directive of this cause, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (swr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Barrington Patterson. Filing fees $ 402.00. No Filing Fee/No IFP Filed, filed by Barrington Patterson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Summon(s), #4 Summon(s))Case restricted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. (Liebenhaut, Matthew) Modified Text on 5/18/2022 (swr). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
