UI Technologies, Inc. et al v. Ricoma International Corp. et al
| UI Technologies, Inc. and UI Digital Inc. |
| Ricoma International Corp., Wenrui "Henry" Ma and Miguel Andoni Ciarreta |
| 1:2022cv21631 |
| May 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Miami Office |
| Darrin P Gayles |
| Edwin G Torres |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 76 REPLY to Response to Motion re #60 MOTION TO DISMISS #40 Form AO 120/121 FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Miguel Andoni Ciarreta, Wenrui "Henry" Ma, Ricoma International Corp.. (Schwartz, Robert) |
| Filing 75 REPLY to Response to Motion re #22 MOTION for Order to Show Cause Why a Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue , and Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction #23 filed by UI Digital Inc., UI Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Dovi Second Declaration in Support of MPI, #2 Exhibit Saporiti Declaration in Support of MPI)(Nelles, Matthew) |
| Filing 74 NOTICE by UI Digital Inc., UI Technologies, Inc. re #71 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #69 Response in Opposition to Motion,, for Preliminary Injunction (Nelles, Matthew) |
| Filing 73 RESPONSE in Opposition re #71 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #69 Response in Opposition to Motion,, for Preliminary Injunction filed by Miguel Andoni Ciarreta, Wenrui "Henry" Ma, Ricoma International Corp.. Replies due by 7/25/2022. (Schwartz, Robert) |
| Filing 72 Corporate Disclosure Statement and Certificate of Interested Persons by UI Digital Inc., UI Technologies, Inc. (Nelles, Matthew) |
| Filing 71 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #69 Response in Opposition to Motion,, for Preliminary Injunction by UI Digital Inc., UI Technologies, Inc.. (Nelles, Matthew) |
| Filing 70 RESPONSE in Opposition re #60 MOTION TO DISMISS #40 Form AO 120/121 FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by UI Digital Inc., UI Technologies, Inc.. Replies due by 7/22/2022. (Nelles, Matthew) |
| Filing 69 RESPONSE in Opposition re #48 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer to [DE22] Order to Show Cause and [DE23] Memorandum filed by Miguel Andoni Ciarreta, Wenrui "Henry" Ma, Ricoma International Corp.. Replies due by 7/18/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G-1, #8 Exhibit G-2, #9 Exhibit H-1, #10 Exhibit H-2, #11 Exhibit I, #12 Exhibit J, #13 Exhibit K, #14 Exhibit L, #15 Declaration of Henry Ma, #16 Declaration of Julie Lamdanski)(Schwartz, Robert) |
| Filing 68 PAPERLESS Minute Entry for proceedings held before Ch. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres: Scheduling Conference held on 7/6/2022. Evidentiary Hearing on the Motion for Preliminary Injunction set for 8/23/22 - two days. Order to follow. Total time in court: 1 hour(s). Attorney Appearance(s): Robert Martin Schwartz, Marc E. Hankin, Matthew Scott Nelles, Other appearances: Elodie Bardon. (Digital EGT 01 7/6/22 ZOOM) (br) |
| Filing 67 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #66 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Motion to Dismiss, for good cause shown:Response to Motion to Dismiss now due 7/15/2022. Signed by Ch. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres on 7/5/2022. (EGT) |
| Reset Deadlines Per DE#67. Responses due by 7/15/2022 (cqs) |
| Filing 66 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #60 MOTION TO DISMISS #40 Form AO 120/121 FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by UI Digital Inc., UI Technologies, Inc.. (Nelles, Matthew) |
| Filing 65 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #63 Motion for Rule 16 Scheduling Conference: Scheduling Conference set for 7/6/2022 02:00 PM in Miami Division before Ch. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres. If counsel agree the conference can be scheduled by remote means over Zoom. Counsel shall confer and advise the courtroom deputy as to any such agreement by 7/1/2022. Signed by Ch. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres on 6/24/2022. (EGT) |
| Filing 64 RESPONSE to Motion re #63 MOTION for Magistrate Scheduling Conference re #62 SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 26(f)/16.1, #23 Response - Miscellaneous and to set hearing on Defendants' Motion for Preliminary Injunction [ECF 23] filed by Miguel Andoni Ciarreta, Wenrui "Henry" Ma, Ricoma International Corp.. Replies due by 7/1/2022. (Schwartz, Robert) |
| Filing 63 MOTION for Magistrate Scheduling Conference re #62 SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 26(f)/16.1, #23 Response - Miscellaneous and to set hearing on Defendants' Motion for Preliminary Injunction [ECF 23] by UI Digital Inc., UI Technologies, Inc.. (Nelles, Matthew) |
| Filing 62 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 26(f) by UI Digital Inc., UI Technologies, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Scheduling Order)(Nelles, Matthew) |
| Filing 61 Defendant's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by Ricoma International Corp. (Schwartz, Robert) |
| Filing 60 MOTION TO DISMISS #40 Form AO 120/121 FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Miguel Andoni Ciarreta, Wenrui "Henry" Ma. Responses due by 7/5/2022 (Schwartz, Robert) |
| Filing 59 Defendant Ricoma International Corp.'s ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by Ricoma International Corp.. (Schwartz, Robert) |
Filing 58
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #57 Unopposed Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorneys Deana Davidian and Thomas George O'Brien are withdrawn from this case. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (hs01)
|
| Filing 57 Unopposed MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Deana Davidian and Thomas G. O'Brien for / by UI Digital Inc., UI Technologies, Inc.. Responses due by 6/23/2022 (Nelles, Matthew) |
| Filing 56 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #55 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Attorney Marc E. Hankin. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres on 6/9/2022. (elk) |
| Filing 55 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Marc E. Hankin. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-15703632 by UI Digital Inc., UI Technologies, Inc.. Responses due by 6/23/2022 (Attachments: #1 Certification, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Nelles, Matthew) |
| Filing 54 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #53 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney for good cause shown. Maxim H. Waldbaum representing Ricoma International Corp. (Defendant), Guofeng "Henry" Ma (Defendant), and Miguel Andoni Ciarreta (Defendant) is withdrawn from the case. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres on 6/8/2022. (elk) |
| Filing 53 Unopposed MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Maxim H. Waldbaum for / by Miguel Andoni Ciarreta, Wenrui "Henry" Ma, Ricoma International Corp.. Responses due by 6/22/2022 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Schwartz, Robert) |
|
Filing 52
PAPERLESS ORDER REQUIRING JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT AND PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER. Pursuant to S.D. Fla. Local Rule 16.1, on or before June 22, 2022, the parties shall prepare and file a Joint Scheduling Report, as well as Certificates of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure Statements.The parties shall also file a Proposed Scheduling Order, adhering to the format and guidance of the attached form. If the parties deviate in any way from that format and guidance, they shall contemporaneously submit a written explanation, which provides their purported justification for each and every deviation. If the parties fail to submit such written explanation, the Court may enter a Scheduling Order that does not take into account the parties' proposed dates.Failure to comply with this Order shall be grounds for dismissal without prejudice and without further notice. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles See attached document for full details. (hs01)
|
|
Filing 51
PAPERLESS ORDER REFERRING CASE to Chief Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and a report and recommendation on all dispositive matters. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (hs01)
|
|
Filing 50
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #48 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants shall respond to Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction on or before July 9, 2022. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (hs01)
|
|
Filing 49
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #45 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants shall respond to the Complaint on or before June 20, 2022. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (hs01)
|
| Filing 48 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer by Miguel Andoni Ciarreta, Wenrui "Henry" Ma, Ricoma International Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Schwartz, Robert) |
| Filing 47 REPLY to Response to Motion re #45 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #40 Form AO 120/121 Complaint 40-1 filed by Miguel Andoni Ciarreta, Wenrui "Henry" Ma, Ricoma International Corp.. (Schwartz, Robert) |
| Filing 46 RESPONSE in Opposition re #45 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #40 Form AO 120/121 Complaint 40-1 filed by UI Digital Inc., UI Technologies, Inc.. Replies due by 6/10/2022. (Nelles, Matthew) |
| Filing 45 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #40 Form AO 120/121 Complaint 40-1 by Miguel Andoni Ciarreta, Wenrui "Henry" Ma, Ricoma International Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Schwartz, Robert) |
| Filing 44 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Euyelit Adriana Moreno Kostencki on behalf of UI Digital Inc., UI Technologies, Inc.. Attorney Euyelit Adriana Moreno Kostencki added to party UI Digital Inc.(pty:pla), Attorney Euyelit Adriana Moreno Kostencki added to party UI Technologies, Inc.(pty:pla). (Moreno Kostencki, Euyelit) |
| Filing 43 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Matthew Scott Nelles on behalf of UI Digital Inc., UI Technologies, Inc.. Attorney Matthew Scott Nelles added to party UI Digital Inc.(pty:pla), Attorney Matthew Scott Nelles added to party UI Technologies, Inc.(pty:pla). (Nelles, Matthew) |
| Filing 42 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. Unless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion shall be double-spaced in Times New Roman 12-point typeface. Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the striking of the motion or dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (hs01) |
| Filing 41 Bar Letter re: Admissions sent to attorney 26 Maxim H. Waldbaum, Thomas G. O'Brien, Marc E. Hankin, Deana Davidian, mailing date May 26, 2022, (pt) |
| Filing 40 FORM AO 120 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK. (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (jua) |
| Filing 39 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jua) |
| Filing 38 Case transferred in from New York Eastern; Case Number 2:22-cv-00220. Electronic file including transfer order and docket sheet received. .(jua). |
|
Filing 37
ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, Defendants #27 motion to dismiss or transfer for improper venue is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to transfer this action to the Southern District of Florida. Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 5/26/2022. (Jakubowski, Laura)
|
| Case transferred to Southern District of Florida. Original file, certified copy of transfer order, and docket sheet sent. ALL FILINGS ARE TO BE MADE IN THE TRANSFER COURT, DO NOT DOCKET TO THIS CASE. (Jakubowski, Laura) |
| Filing 36 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert M Schwartz on behalf of All Defendants (notification declined or already on case) (Schwartz, Robert) |
| Filing 35 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number ANYEDC-15320083. by Miguel Andoni Ciarreta, Guofeng "Henry" Ma, Ricoma International Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Robert M. Schwartz, #2 Declaration of Robert M. Schwartz in Support of Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice and Exhibit) (Schwartz, Robert) |
|
ORDER granting #35 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Having reviewed the Pro Hac Vice application #35 submitted by Robert M. Schwartz for all Defendants and found it to be in compliance with the local rules concerning attorney admissions, the application is approved. If not already done, the attorney shall register for ECF which is available online at the NYED's homepage. Once registered, the attorney shall file a notice of appearance and ensure that he receives electronic notifications of activity in this case. The attorney shall ensure that the $150 admission fee is submitted or has been submitted to the Clerk's Office. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione on 2/24/2022. (Vasquez, Lea)
|
| Filing 34 REPLY in Opposition re #33 Reply in Support, #31 Response to Motion, Order on Motion for Pre Motion Conference, Supplemental Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss or Transfer filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Joseph Dovi, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 1 - Advertisements, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 2 - Emails with Customer, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 3 - Sales Contract and Packing Slip, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 4 - LinkedIn Profiles, #6 Exhibit Exhibit 5 - Ricoma Website) (Davidian, Deana) |
| Filing 33 REPLY in Support re Order on Motion for Pre Motion Conference, Defendants' letter #27 filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support OF SUPPLEMENTAL DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR (1) IMPROPER VENUE OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE TO TRANSFER VENUE and (2) FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, #2 Exhibit A - Declaration of Henry Ma, #3 Exhibit B - Detail by Entity Name, #4 Exhibit C - Declaration of Miguel A Ciarreta) (Waldbaum, Maxim) |
| Filing 32 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Ricoma International Corp. (Waldbaum, Maxim) |
|
ORDER: The Court waives its pre-motion conference requirement and will construe Defendants' letter, #27 , as a motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue or in the Alternative to Transfer for improper venue, and Plaintiff's response, #31 , as an opposition to the motion. Should the parties wish to supplement their positions, they may do so in writing by 2/23/2022. Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 2/16/2022. (Walsh, Catherine)
|
| Filing 31 RESPONSE to Motion re #27 First MOTION for pre motion conference /letter motion seeking pre-motion conference filed by All Plaintiffs. (Davidian, Deana) |
| Filing 30 SUMMONS Returned Executed by UI Technologies, Inc., UI Digital Inc.. Miguel Andoni Ciarreta served on 1/27/2022, answer due 2/17/2022. (O'Brien, Thomas) |
| Filing 29 SUMMONS Returned Executed by UI Technologies, Inc., UI Digital Inc.. Guofeng "Henry" Ma served on 1/27/2022, answer due 2/17/2022. (O'Brien, Thomas) |
| Filing 28 SUMMONS Returned Executed by UI Technologies, Inc., UI Digital Inc.. Ricoma International Corp. served on 1/27/2022, answer due 2/17/2022. (O'Brien, Thomas) |
| Filing 27 First MOTION for pre motion conference /letter motion seeking pre-motion conference by Miguel Andoni Ciarreta, Guofeng "Henry" Ma, Ricoma International Corp.. (Waldbaum, Maxim). Added MOTION to Transfer Venue on 5/26/2022 pursuant to Judge Azrack's 2/16/2022 Order. (Jakubowski, Laura). |
| Filing 26 NOTICE of Appearance by Maxim H. Waldbaum on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Waldbaum, Maxim) |
| Filing 25 AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION in Support re #22 MOTION for Order to Show Cause Why a Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue filed by UI Digital Inc., UI Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 8 (Luminaris 200 Product Webpage), #2 Exhibit 9 (Ricoma LuminRip Quick Reference Guide), #3 Exhibit 10 (Reseller Agreement), #4 Exhibit 11 (Luminaris Cartridge Complaint), #5 Exhibit 12 (Comparison Chart)) (Davidian, Deana) |
| Filing 24 AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION in Support re #22 MOTION for Order to Show Cause Why a Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue filed by UI Digital Inc., UI Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 (US Patent No. 9,835,968), #2 Exhibit 2 (US Patent No. 9,835,981), #3 Exhibit 3 (US Patent No. 9,835,982), #4 Exhibit 4 (US Patent No. 10,310,446), #5 Exhibit 5 (US Patent No. 10,649,372), #6 Exhibit 6 (US Patent No. 10,459,670), #7 Exhibit 7 (Patent Infringement Claim Chart)) (Davidian, Deana) |
| Filing 23 MEMORANDUM in Support re #22 MOTION for Order to Show Cause Why a Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue filed by UI Digital Inc., UI Technologies, Inc.. (Davidian, Deana) |
| Filing 22 MOTION for Order to Show Cause Why a Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue by UI Digital Inc., UI Technologies, Inc.. (Davidian, Deana) |
| Filing 21 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number ANYEDC-15231728. by UI Digital Inc., UI Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Marc E Hankin, #2 Declaration of Marc E Hankin in Support of Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice and Exhibits) (Hankin, Marc) |
|
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay no longer assigned to case Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such.Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 1/26/2022. (Davis, Kimberly)
|
|
ORDER granting #21 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Having reviewed the Pro Hac Vice application #21 submitted by Marc E. Hankin for Plaintiffs and found it to be in compliance with the local rules concerning attorney admissions, the application is approved. If not already done, the attorney shall register for ECF which is available online at the NYED's homepage. Once registered, the attorney shall file a notice of appearance and ensure that he receives electronic notifications of activity in this case. The attorney shall ensure that the $150 admission fee is submitted or has been submitted to the Clerk's Office. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione on 1/26/2022. (Vasquez, Lea)
|
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas G. O'Brien on behalf of UI Digital Inc., UI Technologies, Inc. (aty to be noticed) (O'Brien, Thomas) |
| Filing 19 Notice of Report on the filing of an action regarding a Patent. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I) (Cox, Dwayne) |
| Filing 18 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Cox, Dwayne) |
| Filing 17 Case transferred in from District of New York Southern; Case Number 1:21-cv-11117. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| CASE TRANSFERRED OUT ELECTRONICALLY from the U.S.D.C. Southern District of New York to the United States District Court - District of Eastern District of New York.(ate) [Transferred from New York Southern on 1/14/2022.] |
|
Filing 16
MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: #15 Response to Order to Show Cause filed by UI Technologies, Inc., UI Digital Inc. ENDORSEMENT: This case is hereby transferred to the Eastern District of New York in the interest of justice, inasmuch as the Plaintiffs reside there and consent to transfer. See 28 U.S.C. 1404. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 1/7/2022) (ate) Transmission to Office of the Clerk of Court for processing. [Transferred from New York Southern on 1/14/2022.]
|
| Filing 15 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re: #14 Order to Show Cause,,,. Document filed by UI Digital Inc., UI Technologies, Inc...(Davidian, Deana) [Transferred from New York Southern on 1/14/2022.] |
|
Filing 14
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Plaintiffs must, no later than January 17, 2022, show cause in writing why this case should not be transferred to the Eastern District of New York in the interest of justice, inasmuch as Plaintiffs are located in the Eastern District of New York and - aside from a conclusory statement that "a substantial part of the events giving rise to Plaintiffs' claims occurred in this District, and Defendants have done business and committed the complained of acts of infringement in this District" Compl., Dkt. 1 13 - no act of alleged infringement is alleged to have occurred in this District. See 28 U.S.C. 1404(a). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 1/3/2022) (tg) Modified on 1/12/2022 (tg). [Transferred from New York Southern on 1/14/2022.]
|
| Filing 13 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent UI Technologies, Inc. for UI Digital Inc.. Document filed by UI Digital Inc...(Davidian, Deana) [Transferred from New York Southern on 1/14/2022.] |
| Filing 12 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by UI Technologies, Inc...(Davidian, Deana) [Transferred from New York Southern on 1/14/2022.] |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY ERROR. Notice to Attorney Deana Davidian to RE-FILE Document #3 Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement,. ERROR(S): Corporate Parents were not added. Please re-file this document and when prompted: Are there any corporate parents or other affiliates?, select the YES radio button and enter the Corporate Parent(s) or Affiliate(s). YOU MUST SELECT THE SEARCH BUTTON. Select the correct name or create a new corporate parent. Add the Corporate Parent(s) or Affiliate(s) one party name at a time. (lb) [Transferred from New York Southern on 1/14/2022.] |
| Filing 11 AO 120 FORM PATENT - CASE OPENING - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 290, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a court action has been filed on the following patent(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)..(pc) [Transferred from New York Southern on 1/14/2022.] |
| Filing 10 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Miguel Andoni Ciarreta..(pc) [Transferred from New York Southern on 1/14/2022.] |
| Filing 9 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Guofeng "Henry" Ma..(pc) (Main Document 9 replaced on 12/29/2021) (pc). [Transferred from New York Southern on 1/14/2022.] |
| Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Ricoma International Corp...(pc) [Transferred from New York Southern on 1/14/2022.] |
| Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc) [Transferred from New York Southern on 1/14/2022.] |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Valerie E. Caproni. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc) [Transferred from New York Southern on 1/14/2022.] |
| Case Designated ECF. (pc) [Transferred from New York Southern on 1/14/2022.] |
| Filing 7 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Miguel Andoni Ciarreta, re: #1 Complaint,,. Document filed by UI Digital Inc., UI Technologies, Inc...(Davidian, Deana) [Transferred from New York Southern on 1/14/2022.] |
| Filing 6 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Guofeng "Henry" Ma, re: #1 Complaint,,. Document filed by UI Digital Inc., UI Technologies, Inc...(Davidian, Deana) [Transferred from New York Southern on 1/14/2022.] |
| Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Ricoma International Corp., re: #1 Complaint,,. Document filed by UI Digital Inc., UI Technologies, Inc...(Davidian, Deana) [Transferred from New York Southern on 1/14/2022.] |
| Filing 4 AO 120 FORM PATENT - NOTICE OF SUBMISSION BY ATTORNEY. AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark for case opening submitted to court for review..(Davidian, Deana) [Transferred from New York Southern on 1/14/2022.] |
| Filing 3 FILING ERROR - CORPORATE PARENT/OTHER AFFILIATE NOT ADDED - RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by UI Digital Inc., UI Technologies, Inc...(Davidian, Deana) Modified on 1/3/2022 (lb). [Transferred from New York Southern on 1/14/2022.] |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Davidian, Deana) [Transferred from New York Southern on 1/14/2022.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Miguel Andoni Ciarreta, Guofeng "Henry" Ma, Ricoma International Corp.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25519549)Document filed by UI Technologies, Inc., UI Digital Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (U.S. Patent No. 9,835,968), #2 Exhibit B (U.S. Patent No. 9,835,981), #3 Exhibit C (U.S. Patent No. 9,835,982), #4 Exhibit D (U.S. Patent No. 10,310,446), #5 Exhibit E (U.S. Patent No. 10,649,372), #6 Exhibit F (U.S. Patent No. 10,459,670), #7 Exhibit G (Reseller Agreement), #8 Exhibit H (Claim Infringement Chart), #9 Exhibit I (Demand Letter dated 8/13/2021)).(Davidian, Deana) [Transferred from New York Southern on 1/14/2022.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
