Alameda Tower 4 Condominium Association, Inc. v. Axis Surplus Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Alameda Tower 4 Condominium Association, Inc.
Defendant: Axis Surplus Insurance Company
Case Number: 1:2022cv21634
Filed: May 26, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Chris M McAliley
Referring Judge: Kathleen M Williams
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER DISMISSING AND CLOSING CASE (With Prejudice) . Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 7/5/2022. See attached document for full details. (jas)
July 5, 2022 Filing 17 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice (Joint) by Axis Surplus Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Satish, Samantha)
June 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 SCHEDULING ORDER: ( Jury Trial set for 7/17/2023 in Miami Division before Judge Kathleen M. Williams., Calendar Call set for 7/11/2023 11:00 AM in Miami Division before Judge Kathleen M. Williams.) Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 6/17/2022. See attached document for full details. (ls) #Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here.
June 14, 2022 Filing 15 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 16.1 by Axis Surplus Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Satish, Samantha)
June 10, 2022 Filing 14 NOTICE by Axis Surplus Insurance Company re #13 Status Report, #5 Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge,, Notice of Court Practice/to Appear/Other, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Pleadings) (Satish, Samantha)
June 10, 2022 Filing 13 STATUS REPORT Removal Status Report by Axis Surplus Insurance Company (Satish, Samantha)
June 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss #9 . In light of Plaintiff's Notice of Non-Opposition #11 , the Motion is GRANTED. Count II of the Complaint #1 is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 6/9/2022. (er01)
June 9, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE by Alameda Tower 4 Condominium Association, Inc. re #9 MOTION to Dismiss the State Court Complaint contained within the Notice of Removal with Prejudice #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), Count II Plaintiff's Notice of Non-Opposition (Elsinger, Garrett)
June 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS MATTER is before the Court on a review of the record. In light of Plaintiff's Notice #6 , which the Court struck, and the "Agreed" proposed order attached to the Motion to Dismiss #9 , if Plaintiff does not oppose Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiff shall file a notice of non-opposition on or before June 10, 2022. If Plaintiff does intend to file an opposition to the Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiff shall file its opposition on or before June 16, 2022. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 6/7/2022. (shy)
June 2, 2022 Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss the State Court Complaint contained within the Notice of Removal with Prejudice #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), Count II by Axis Surplus Insurance Company. Responses due by 6/16/2022 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Satish, Samantha)
June 2, 2022 Filing 8 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint re the Notice of Removal by Axis Surplus Insurance Company. (Satish, Samantha)
June 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 PAPERLESS ORDER STRIKING #6 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, #4 Notice of Change of Attorney. THIS MATTER is before the Court on a review of the record. Local Rule 11.1(d)(3) provides, "no attorney shall withdraw the attorney's appearance in any action or proceeding except by leave of Court after notice served on the attorney's client and opposing counsel." Accordingly, Plaintiff's Notice of Change of Attorney #4 is STRICKEN. If prior counsel wishes to withdraw, counsel must file a proper motion to substitute counsel. Furthermore, parties may not voluntarily dismiss claims using a notice of voluntary dismissal under Rule 41(a), which governs the dismissal of actions, not claims. See Klay v. United Healthgroup, Inc., 376 F.3d 1092, 1106 (11th Cir. 2004). The correct procedure to dismiss a claim, while permitting remaining claims to proceed, is a motion to dismiss or a motion to amend under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a). Id. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal #6 is STRICKEN. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 6/1/2022. (shy)
June 1, 2022 Filing 6 STRICKEN - NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of Count 2 With Prejudice by Alameda Tower 4 Condominium Association, Inc. (Elsinger, Garrett) Modified/Stricken per DE 7 on 6/2/2022 (pes).
May 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER OF REFERRAL AND NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE IN REMOVAL CASES, referring case to Magistrate Judge Chris M. McAliley for Pretrial Non-Dispositive Matters. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 5/27/2022. See attached document for full details. (pcs)
May 27, 2022 Filing 4 STRICKEN - NOTICE of Change of Attorney With Firm and Amended Designation of Email Address by Garrett Scott Elsinger on behalf of Alameda Tower 4 Condominium Association, Inc.. Attorney Garrett Scott Elsinger added to party Alameda Tower 4 Condominium Association, Inc.(pty:pla). (Elsinger, Garrett) Modified to convert document into a motion on 5/27/2022 (kpe). Modified/Stricken per DE 7 on 6/2/2022 (pes).
May 27, 2022 Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE - Attorney John Salcedo has not been added to this case due to his membership status in this Court's Bar #https://www.flsd.uscourts.gov/flsd-bar-admission-status-and-admission-date-look. For further information, please contact Attorney Admissions at 305-523-5265. re #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), (pt)
May 26, 2022 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Kathleen M. Williams. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Chris M. McAliley is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (kpe)
May 26, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - ALAMEDA TOWER 4 CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. vs. AXIS SURPLUS INSURANCE COMPANY) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15670749, filed by Axis Surplus Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lewis, William) No answer/motion to dismiss filed. Modified text on 5/27/2022 (kpe).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alameda Tower 4 Condominium Association, Inc. v. Axis Surplus Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alameda Tower 4 Condominium Association, Inc.
Represented By: Garrett Scott Elsinger
Represented By: Peter Mineo, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Axis Surplus Insurance Company
Represented By: William Roderick Lewis
Represented By: Samantha Apoorva Satish
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?