McDermott v. EVTV Miami Inc.
| Matthew McDermott |
| EVTV Miami Inc. |
| 1:2022cv21728 |
| June 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Jose E Martinez |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 0501 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 FORM AO 121 and Order Mailed TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. COPYRIGHT OFFICE (cds) |
Filing 11
ORDER ON NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT. Administratively Closing Case. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 7/13/2022. See attached document for full details. (cds)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Settlement by Matthew McDermott (Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 9 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by Matthew McDermott (Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 8 Notice of Pending, Refiled, Related or Similar Actions by Matthew McDermott (Sanders, Craig) |
|
Filing 7
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #6 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer the Complaint. Defendant shall have through and including July 13, 2022. to respond to the complaint. No further extensions will be granted absent exigent circumstances. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 7/6/2022. (cvl)
|
| Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint, Up to and Including July 13, 2022 by EVTV Miami Inc.. Attorney Joshua Howard Sheskin added to party EVTV Miami Inc.(pty:dft). (Sheskin, Joshua) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Matthew McDermott. EVTV Miami Inc. served on 6/9/2022, response/answer due 6/30/2022. (Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to EVTV Miami Inc.. (swr) |
| Filing 3 FORM AO 121 AND COMPLAINT SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. COPYRIGHT OFFICE (swr) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Jose E. Martinez. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (swr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against EVTV Miami Inc.. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15695438, filed by Matthew McDermott. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Original Photograph, #2 Exhibit Infringing Use of the Photograph, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summon(s))(Sanders, Craig) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: McDermott v. EVTV Miami Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Matthew McDermott | |
| Represented By: | Craig B Sanders |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: EVTV Miami Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Joshua Howard Sheskin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
