Vergara v. Ralph Lauren Retail, Inc.
Pedro Vergara |
Ralph Lauren Retail, Inc. |
1:2022cv22125 |
July 12, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Cecilia M Altonaga |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice (Joint) by Ralph Lauren Retail, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Kline, Arlene) |
Filing 7 Administrative Order Closing Case. Denying as moot #6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint filed by Ralph Lauren Retail, Inc. Signed by Chief Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga on 7/29/2022. See attached document for full details. (ps1) |
Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by Ralph Lauren Retail, Inc.. Attorney Arlene Karin Kline added to party Ralph Lauren Retail, Inc.(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Kline, Arlene) |
Filing 5 ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING REPORT AND CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES. Joint Scheduling Report and Certificates of Interested Parties due by 8/22/2022. Signed by Chief Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga on 7/27/2022. See attached document for full details. (wc) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Pedro Vergara. Ralph Lauren Retail, Inc. served on 7/18/2022, response/answer due 8/8/2022. (Duran, Pelayo) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Ralph Lauren Retail, Inc. (jua) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Chief Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jua) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ralph Lauren Retail, Inc.. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15782471, filed by Pedro Vergara. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Summon(s))(Duran, Pelayo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Vergara v. Ralph Lauren Retail, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Pedro Vergara | |
Represented By: | Roderick Victor Hannah |
Represented By: | Pelayo M. Duran |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Ralph Lauren Retail, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Arlene Karin Kline |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.