Vergara v. Ralph Lauren Retail, Inc.
Plaintiff: Pedro Vergara
Defendant: Ralph Lauren Retail, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2022cv22125
Filed: July 12, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Cecilia M Altonaga
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 24, 2022 Filing 8 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice (Joint) by Ralph Lauren Retail, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Kline, Arlene)
July 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Administrative Order Closing Case. Denying as moot #6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint filed by Ralph Lauren Retail, Inc. Signed by Chief Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga on 7/29/2022. See attached document for full details. (ps1)
July 29, 2022 Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by Ralph Lauren Retail, Inc.. Attorney Arlene Karin Kline added to party Ralph Lauren Retail, Inc.(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Kline, Arlene)
July 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING REPORT AND CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES. Joint Scheduling Report and Certificates of Interested Parties due by 8/22/2022. Signed by Chief Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga on 7/27/2022. See attached document for full details. (wc)
July 27, 2022 Filing 4 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Pedro Vergara. Ralph Lauren Retail, Inc. served on 7/18/2022, response/answer due 8/8/2022. (Duran, Pelayo)
July 12, 2022 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Ralph Lauren Retail, Inc. (jua)
July 12, 2022 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Chief Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jua)
July 12, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ralph Lauren Retail, Inc.. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15782471, filed by Pedro Vergara. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Summon(s))(Duran, Pelayo)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vergara v. Ralph Lauren Retail, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pedro Vergara
Represented By: Roderick Victor Hannah
Represented By: Pelayo M. Duran
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ralph Lauren Retail, Inc.
Represented By: Arlene Karin Kline
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?