Jarrett v. Miami-Dade Police Dept. et al
| Jamal K. Jarrett |
| Miami-Dade Police Dept., Jackson Memorial Hospital and State of Florida Attorney General |
| 1:2022cv22178 |
| July 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Kathleen M Williams |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER REQUIRING PAYMENT OF FILING FEE OR MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. On or before August 25, 2022, Plaintiff shall either pay the $402.00 filing fee or shall complete and file the form application to proceed without payment of fees attached to this Order. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 7/25/2022. See attached document for full details. (Attachments: #1 IFP Form) (daa)
|
| Filing 3 INSTRUCTIONS TO PRO SE CIVIL RIGHTS LITIGANTS. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 7/25/2022. See attached document for full details. (daa) |
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge Kathleen M. Williams. (daa) |
| Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami-Dade Police Dept., State of Florida Attorney General. Filing fee $ 402.00 (Filing fee not paid/IFP Motion not filed), filed by Jamal K. Jarrett.(daa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
