Bennett v. Standard Insurance Company
| Kathryn Bennett |
| Standard Insurance Company |
| 1:2022cv22337 |
| July 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Chris M McAliley |
| Kathleen M Williams |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT. Case transferred from Florida Southern has been opened in Eastern District of Wisconsin as case 2:22-cv-01074, filed 09/16/2022. (jua) |
Filing 12
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION #10 TO TRANSFER VENUE TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN- Closing Case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chris M. McAliley on 9/16/2022. See attached document for full details. (mab)
|
| SYSTEM ENTRY - Case 1:22-cv-22337 electronically transferred out to Wisconsin Eastern. (mab) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by Standard Insurance Company. (Furman, Wendy) |
| Filing 10 Joint MOTION to Transfer Venue to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin by Standard Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Joint Motion to Transfer Venue)(Furman, Wendy) |
| Reset Answer Due Deadline: Standard Insurance Company answer due 9/15/2022. Per d.e. 9 Order. (mee) Modified on 8/31/2022 (mee). |
|
Filing 9
PAPERLESS ORDER. Defendant Standard Insurance Company filed a #8 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. For good cause shown, the Court hereby ORDERS that the #8 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED. Defendant shall file its response to the Complaint no later than September 15, 2022. Given that this is Defendant's second request for an extension of time to respond to the Complaint, no further extensions will be given. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chris M. McAliley on 8/30/2022. (nsy)
|
| Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint re #1 Complaint, by Standard Insurance Company. Responses due by 9/12/2022 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Furman, Wendy) |
|
Filing 7
PAPERLESS ORDER. Defendant Standard Insurance Company filed an #6 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. For good cause shown, the Court hereby ORDERS that the #6 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED. Defendant shall file its response to the Complaint no later than September 1, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chris M. McAliley on 8/18/2022. (nsy)
|
| Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint, by Standard Insurance Company. Attorney Wendy Lynn Furman added to party Standard Insurance Company(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Complaint)(Furman, Wendy) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Kathryn Bennett. Standard Insurance Company served on 7/28/2022, response/answer due 8/18/2022. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Vayer, Zoe) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER OF REFERRAL AND SETTING TRIAL DATE: Jury Trial set for 8/28/2023 before Judge Kathleen M. Williams., Calendar Call set for 8/22/2023 at 11:00 AM in Miami Division before Judge Kathleen M. Williams.), ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Chris M.McAliley for a determination of all non-dispositive matters and a report and recommendation on any dispositive matters. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 7/27/2022. See attached document for full details. (mee)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Standard Insurance Company. (swr) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Kathleen M. Williams. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Chris M. McAliley is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (swr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DISABILITY BENEFITS AND LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM WAIVER BENEFITS against Standard Insurance Company. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15820267, filed by Kathryn Bennett. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Vayer, Zoe) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bennett v. Standard Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kathryn Bennett | |
| Represented By: | Edward Philip Dabdoub |
| Represented By: | Zoe Hope Vayer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Standard Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Wendy Lynn Furman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
