Wilcox v. Chanel, Inc.
| Crystal Wilcox |
| Chanel, Inc. |
| 1:2022cv22519 |
| August 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Melissa Damian |
| James Lawrence King |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
SCHEDULING ORDER: ( Discovery due by 6/28/2023., Motions due by 7/3/2023., Pretrial Stipulation due by 8/25/2023., Jury Trial set for 11/13/2023 09:00 AM in Miami Division before Senior Judge James Lawrence King., Calendar Call set for 11/9/2023 10:00 AM in Miami Division before Senior Judge James Lawrence King., Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/1/2023 11:45 AM in Miami Division before Senior Judge James Lawrence King. All hearings to be held before Judge King will be held in Courtroom II, Eleventh Floor.), ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Melissa Damian for Discovery Matters. Signed by Senior Judge James Lawrence King on 8/31/2022. See attached document for full details. (jw) #Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here.
|
| Filing 13 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint re the Notice of Removal by Chanel, Inc.. (Drummond, Alexandre) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES:GRANTING (12) Motion to Consolidate Cases in case 1:22-cv-22517-JLK. All further proceedings to be filed and docketed in 22-cv-22517. Signed by Senior Judge James Lawrence King on 8/25/2022. See attached document for full details. Associated Cases: 1:22-cv-22517-JLK, 1:22-cv-22519-JLK, 1:22-cv-22520-JLK (mab) Modified text on 8/25/2022 (asl).
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to Senior Judge James Lawrence King for all further proceedings, accepted and signed on 8/25/2022. The Court orders that case numbers 22-cv-22520 and 22-cv-22519 be consolidated into Cal Campos v. Chanel, Inc. Case No. 22-cv-22517. All future filings across all three actions must be made in the docket for case number 22-cv-22517-JLK. Judge K. Michael Moore no longer assigned to case Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 8/24/2022. See attached document for full details. (pcs) Modified on 8/25/2022 (pcs).
|
| Cases associated. (pcs) |
| Filing 10 Plaintiff's MOTION to Consolidate Cases Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion to Transfer and Consolidate Cases by Crystal Wilcox. Responses due by 9/6/2022 (Bolen, Rani) |
| Filing 9 Plaintiff's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Crystal Wilcox (Bolen, Rani) |
|
Filing 8
PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Defendant Chanel, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion for An Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. #3 . UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motion, the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant's Unopposed Motion for An Extension of Time #3 is GRANTED. Defendant shall respond to Plaintiff's Complaint [1-2] on or before August 30, 2022. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 8/11/2022. (fpi)
|
|
Filing 7
PAPERLESS ORDER REFERRING PRETRIAL DISCOVERY MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE LAUREN F. LOUIS. PURSUANT to 28 U.S.C. 636 and the Magistrate Judge Rules of the Local Rules of the Southern District of Florida, the above-captioned Cause is referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lauren F. Louis to take all necessary and proper action as required by law with respect to any and all pretrial discovery matters. Any motion affecting deadlines set by the Court's Scheduling Order is excluded from this referral, unless specifically referred by separate Order. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall comply with Magistrate Judge Lauren F. Louis's discovery procedures. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 8/11/2022. (fpi)
|
|
Filing 6
PAPERLESS PRETRIAL ORDER. THIS ORDER has been entered upon the filing of a Notice of Removal. Counsel for the removing party is hereby ORDERED to forward a copy of this Order to all other parties. It is further ORDERED that S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1 shall apply to this case and the parties shall hold a scheduling conference within twenty (20) days of the date of this Order. Within ten (10) days of the scheduling conference, counsel shall file a Joint Scheduling Report. The report shall indicate the proposed month and year for the trial and the estimated number of days required for trial. The scheduling conference may be held via telephone. At the conference, the parties shall comply with the following agenda that the Court adopts from S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1: (1) Documents (S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1.B.1 and 2) The parties shall determine the procedure for exchanging a copy of, or a description by category and location of, all documents and other evidence that is reasonably available and that a party expects to offer, or may offer, if the need arises. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(B). (A) Documents include computations of the nature and extent of any category of damages claimed by the disclosing party unless the computations are privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(C). (B) Documents include insurance agreements which may be at issue with the satisfaction of the judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(D). (2) List of Witnesses - The parties shall exchange the name, address, and telephone number of each individual known to have knowledge of the facts supporting the material allegations of the pleading filed by the party. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(A). The parties have a continuing obligation to disclose this information. (3) Discussions and Deadlines (S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1.B.2) - The parties shall discuss the nature and basis of their claims and defenses and the possibility of a prompt settlement or resolution of the case. Failure to comply with this Order or to exchange the information listed above may result in sanctions and/or the exclusion of documents or witnesses at the time of trial. S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1.I. Failure of counsel to file a joint scheduling report may result in remand or dismissal, default, and the imposition of other sanctions including attorney's fees and costs. The filing of a motion to dismiss, or other motion, does not toll the time for filing a joint scheduling report. Counsel for the non-removing party must file a motion to remand the case on the basis of any defect other than lack of subject matter jurisdiction within thirty (30) days after the filing of the Notice of Removal. The parties are hereby on notice that this Court requires all filings to be formatted in 12 point Times New Roman font and double spaced, including any footnotes, with one inch margins on all sides. Failure to follow these formatting guidelines may result in the filing being stricken, any opposing filing being granted by default, and the imposition of other sanctions, including attorney's fees and costs. Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the striking of the motion or dismissal of this action. The parties shall seek extensions of time in a timely fashion. "A motion for extension of time is not self-executing.... Yet, by filing these motions on or near the last day, and then sitting idle pending the Court's disposition of the motion, parties essentially grant their own motion. The Court will not condone this." Compere v. Nusret Miami, LLC, 2020 WL 2844888, at *2 (S.D. Fla. May 7, 2020) (internal citations omitted). Pursuant to Administrative Order 2016-70 of the Southern District of Florida and consistent with the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit's Local Rules and Internal Operating Procedures, within three (3) days of the conclusion of a trial or other proceeding, parties must file via CM/ECF electronic versions of documentary exhibits admitted into evidence, including photographs of non-documentary physical exhibits. The Parties are directed to comply with each of the requirements set forth in Administrative Order 2016-70 unless directed otherwise by the Court. Telephonic appearances are not permitted for any purpose. Upon reaching a settlement in this matter the parties are instructed to notify the Court by telephone and to file a Notice of Settlement within twenty-four (24) hours. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 8/11/2022. (fpi)
|
| Filing 5 Notice of Pending, Refiled, Related or Similar Actions by Chanel, Inc. (Meier, Alexander) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Chanel, Inc. (Meier, Alexander) |
| Filing 3 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Chanel, Inc.. Responses due by 8/24/2022 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Meier, Alexander) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge K. Michael Moore. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lauren F. Louis is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (swr) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint for Damages - Jury Trial Demanded) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15857451, filed by Chanel, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Complaint, #3 Exhibit Declaration, #4 Exhibit Damages Calculations)(Meier, Alexander) No Answer/Motion to Dismiss Filed. Modified Text on 8/10/2022 (swr). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wilcox v. Chanel, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Crystal Wilcox | |
| Represented By: | Karen Coolman Amlong |
| Represented By: | Rani Nair Bolen |
| Represented By: | William Robert Amlong |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Chanel, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Alexander Charles Meier |
| Represented By: | Alexandre S Drummond |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
