Murray v. Chanel, Inc.
Courtney Murray |
Chanel, Inc. |
1:2022cv22520 |
August 9, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Melissa Damian |
James Lawrence King |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Notice of Removal |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 SCHEDULING ORDER: ( Discovery due by 6/28/2023., Motions due by 7/3/2023., Pretrial Stipulation due by 8/25/2023., Jury Trial set for 11/13/2023 09:00 AM in Miami Division before Senior Judge James Lawrence King., Calendar Call set for 11/9/2023 10:00 AM in Miami Division before Senior Judge James Lawrence King., Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/1/2023 11:45 AM in Miami Division before Senior Judge James Lawrence King. All hearings to be held before Judge King will be held in Courtroom II, Eleventh Floor.), ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Melissa Damian for Discovery Matters. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman no longer assigned as presider/referral judge(s) in case. Signed by Senior Judge James Lawrence King on 8/31/2022. See attached document for full details. (jw) #Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here. |
Filing 13 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint re the Notice of Removal by Chanel, Inc.. (Drummond, Alexandre) |
Filing 12 ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES:GRANTING (12) Motion to Consolidate Cases in case 1:22-cv-22517-JLK. Signed by Senior Judge James Lawrence King on 8/25/2022. See attached document for full details. Associated Cases: 1:22-cv-22517-JLK, 1:22-cv-22519-JLK, 1:22-cv-22520-JLK (mab) |
Cases associated. (pcs) |
Filing 11 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to Senior Judge James Lawrence King for all further proceedings, accepted and signed on 8/25/2022. The Court orders that case numbers 22-cv-22520 and 22-cv-22519 be consolidated into Cal Campos v. Chanel, Inc. Case No. 22-cv-22517. All future filings across all three actions must be made in the docket for case number 22-cv-22517-JLK. Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr no longer assigned to case Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr on 8/24/2022. See attached document for full details. (pcs) Modified on 8/25/2022 (pcs). |
Filing 10 Plaintiff's MOTION to Consolidate Cases Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion to Transfer and Consolidate Cases by Courtney Murray. Responses due by 9/6/2022 (Bolen, Rani) |
Filing 9 Plaintiff's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Courtney Murray (Bolen, Rani) |
Filing 8 PAPERLESS ORDER: The Court grants the unopposed motion #3 . The defendant will respond to the complaint no later than August 30, 2022. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. (eau) |
Set/Reset Response/Answer Due Deadline: Chanel, Inc. response/answer due 8/30/2022. Per DE 8 Order. (ebz) |
Filing 7 MAGISTRATE JUDGE GOODMAN'S DISCOVERY PROCEDURES ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman on 8/12/2022. See attached document for full details. (fbn) |
Filing 6 Order Requiring Discovery and Scheduling Conference and Order Referring Discovery Matters to the Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr on 8/10/2022. See attached document for full details. (jao) |
Filing 5 Notice of Pending, Refiled, Related or Similar Actions by Chanel, Inc. (Meier, Alexander) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Chanel, Inc. (Meier, Alexander) |
Filing 3 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Chanel, Inc.. Responses due by 8/24/2022 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Meier, Alexander) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (pc) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint for Damages - Jury Trial Demanded) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15857500, filed by Chanel, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Complaint, #3 Exhibit Declaration, #4 Exhibit Damages Calculations)(Meier, Alexander). (NO ANSWER/MOTION TO DISMISS FILED) Modified text on 8/10/2022 (pc). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Murray v. Chanel, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Courtney Murray | |
Represented By: | Karen Coolman Amlong |
Represented By: | Rani Nair Bolen |
Represented By: | William Robert Amlong |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Chanel, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Alexander Charles Meier |
Represented By: | Alexandre S Drummond |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.