Tyler v. Standard Insurance Company
| Jamen Tyler |
| Standard Insurance Company |
| 1:2022cv22542 |
| August 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Chris M McAliley |
| Kathleen M Williams |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 STIPULATION of Dismissal without Prejudice (Joint) by Jamen Tyler (Probst, Kevin) |
Filing 9
PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Parties Joint Motion #8 for Extension of Time, filed on September 30, 2022. The Joint Motion seeks an extension of time to comply with the Court's Order (DE 7), which required a joint stipulation of dismissal on or before September 30, 2022. Thus, the Joint Motion for Extension failed to comply with this Court's practices and procedures, which state that "[a]bsent an emergency, requests for extensions of time must be presented to the Court, by motion, no later than 48 hours prior to the deadline from which the Parties are seeking relief. Sanctions may be imposed for non-emergent requests made less than 48 hours prior to the deadline." (Emphasis added.) Nevertheless, upon review of the Joint Motion, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Joint Motion is GRANTED. The Parties' joint stipulation of dismissal in compliance with the Court's Order (DE 7) is due on or before October 14, 2022. Going forward, the Parties are advised that all motions and filings by the Parties must comply fully with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules for the Southern District of Florida, and the Practices and Procedures of this Court. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 10/3/2022. (nlf)
|
| Filing 8 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Stipulation of Dismissal re 7 Order,,,, Administrative Order,,, by Standard Insurance Company. Responses due by 10/14/2022 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File Stipulation of Dismissal)(Furman, Wendy) |
|
Filing 7
PAPERLESS ORDER REQUIRING JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE. THIS MATTER is before the Court on the notice #6 indicating that the Parties have reached a settlement of this matter. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that on or before September 30, 2022, the Parties shall file a joint stipulation to dismiss. If the Parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction, they are advised that they must submit the settlement agreement for review and any stipulation must comply with the Eleventh Circuit's holding in Anago Franchising, Inc. v. Shaz, LLC, 677 F.3d 1272 (11th Cir. 2012). Otherwise, the dismissal of this matter is effective upon the filing of the Parties' joint stipulation of dismissal. Id. All hearings and deadlines are CANCELED. This case is CLOSED for administrative purposes. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 8/31/2022. (nlf)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE by Jamen Tyler Notice of Resolution (Probst, Kevin) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Wendy Lynn Furman on behalf of Standard Insurance Company. Attorney Wendy Lynn Furman added to party Standard Insurance Company(pty:dft). (Furman, Wendy) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER OF REFERRAL AND SETTING TRIAL DATE: (Jury Trial set for 8/28/2023 in Miami Division before Judge Kathleen M. Williams., Calendar Call set for 8/22/2023 11:00 AM before Judge Kathleen M. Williams.), ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Chris M. McAliley for Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 8/11/2022. See attached document for full details. (ebz) #Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here.
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Standard Insurance Company. (pc) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Kathleen M. Williams. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Chris M. McAliley is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (pc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DISABILITY BENEFITS against Standard Insurance Company. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15861427, filed by Jamen Tyler. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Probst, Kevin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Tyler v. Standard Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jamen Tyler | |
| Represented By: | Kevin E Probst |
| Represented By: | Edward Philip Dabdoub |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Standard Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Wendy Lynn Furman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
