Bell Northern Research, LLC v. HMD AMERICA, INC. et al
Plaintiff: Bell Northern Research, LLC
Defendant: HMD AMERICA, INC., HMD GLOBAL OY, SHENZHEN CHINO-E COMMUNICATION CO., LTD., Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd., TINNO MOBILE TECHNOLOGY CORP., SHENZHEN TINNO MOBILE CO., LTD., TINNO USA, INC., Unisoc Technologies Co., Ltd., SPREADTRUM COMMUNICATIONS USA, INC., Wingtech Technology Co., Ltd., WINGTECH INTERNATIONAL, INC., HUAQIN CO., LTD., Best Buy Co., Inc., Best Buy Stores L.P., Target Corp. and Walmart Inc.
Case Number: 1:2022cv22706
Filed: August 25, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Jonathan Goodman
Referring Judge: Robert N Scola
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 63 RESPONSE in Opposition re #59 Joint MOTION to Set Common Response Deadline filed by Bell Northern Research, LLC. Replies due by 10/28/2022. (Rojas, Jose)
October 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER granting #61 Motion for Order Authorizing Alternate Service of Process. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr on 10/21/2022. See attached document for full details. (scn)
October 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 61 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to Effect Alternative Service Under Rule 4(f)(3) re #4 Summons Issued for Service Abroad by Bell Northern Research, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Rojas, Jose)
October 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 60 PAPERLESS ORDER: expediting the briefing schedule and resetting the response deadline to #59 the opposed motion to set common response deadline to the complaint filed by Defendants HMD America, Inc.; HMD Global Oy, Tinno Mobile Technology Corp.; Shenzhen Tinno Mobile Co., Ltd.; Tinno USA, Inc.; Wingtech Technology Co., Ltd.; Wingtech International, Inc.; and Walmart Inc. The Plaintiff's response to the motion is due by October 21, 2022. The Court reminds the Defendants that the pendency of a motion for extension for time does not extend deadlines. "Deadlines are extended by orders of the Court. If a motion is pending and has not been granted, it is incumbent upon the party to comply with the deadline even if a motion for extension of that deadline is awaiting a ruling." Setai Hotel Acquisition, LLC v. Miami Beach Luxury Rentals, Inc., No. 16-21296-Civ, 2016 WL 8677230, at *2 n.1 (S.D. Fla. Oct. 14, 2016); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b). Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. (cst)
October 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 59 Joint MOTION to Set Common Response Deadline by HMD AMERICA, INC., HMD GLOBAL OY, Walmart Inc.. Attorney Joseph William Bain added to party HMD AMERICA, INC.(pty:dft), Attorney Joseph William Bain added to party HMD GLOBAL OY(pty:dft), Attorney Joseph William Bain added to party Walmart Inc.(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Motion to Set Common Response Deadline)(Bain, Joseph)
October 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 58 Notice of Upcoming Deadline to Serve under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr on 10/3/2022. See attached document for full details. (scn)
September 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 57 PAPERLESS ORDER: granting counsel's motion to appear pro hac vice, consent to designation, and request to electronically receive notices of electronic filing. #54 . Attorney Christopher J. Gass is given permission to appear and participate in this matter on behalf of Wingtech Technology Co., Ltd., and Wingtech International, Inc. The Clerk is directed to provide this attorney with notification of all electronic filings via the email address set forth in the motion. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. (cst)
September 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 56 PAPERLESS ORDER: granting counsel's motion to appear pro hac vice, consent to designation, and request to electronically receive notices of electronic filing. #53 . Attorney Nicole E. Kopinski is given permission to appear and participate in this matter on behalf of Wingtech Technology Co., Ltd., and Wingtech International, Inc. The Clerk is directed to provide this attorney with notification of all electronic filings via the email address set forth in the motion. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. (cst)
September 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 55 PAPERLESS ORDER: granting counsel's motion to appear pro hac vice, consent to designation, and request to electronically receive notices of electronic filing. #52 . Attorney David M. Airan is given permission to appear and participate in this matter on behalf of Wingtech Technology Co., Ltd., and Wingtech International, Inc. The Clerk is directed to provide this attorney with notification of all electronic filings via the email address set forth in the motion. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. (cst)
September 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 54 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Christopher J. Gass. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-15981510 by WINGTECH INTERNATIONAL, INC., Wingtech Technology Co., Ltd.. Responses due by 10/11/2022 (Attachments: #1 Certification Certification of Christopher Gass, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Pro Hac of Christopher Gass)(Fuller, Andrew)
September 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 53 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Nicole E. Kopinski. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-15981496 by WINGTECH INTERNATIONAL, INC., Wingtech Technology Co., Ltd.. Responses due by 10/11/2022 (Attachments: #1 Certification Certification of Nicole Kopinski, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Pro Hac Vice of Nicole Kopinski)(Fuller, Andrew)
September 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 52 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for David M. Airan. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-15981465 by WINGTECH INTERNATIONAL, INC., Wingtech Technology Co., Ltd.. Attorney Andrew Jay Fuller added to party WINGTECH INTERNATIONAL, INC. (pty:dft), Attorney Andrew Jay Fuller added to party Wingtech Technology Co., Ltd.(pty:dft). Responses due by 10/11/2022 (Attachments: #1 Certification Certification of David Airan, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Pro Hac Motion of David Airan)(Fuller, Andrew)
September 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 51 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Bell Northern Research, LLC. Wingtech Technology Co., Ltd. waiver sent on 9/19/2022, response/answer due 12/19/2022. (Rojas, Jose)
September 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 50 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Bell Northern Research, LLC. WINGTECH INTERNATIONAL, INC. waiver sent on 9/19/2022, response/answer due 11/18/2022. (Rojas, Jose)
September 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 49 NOTICE of Change of Address, Email or Law Firm Name by Jeremy Todd Elman (Elman, Jeremy)
September 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 48 PAPERLESS ORDER: granting Defendant Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.'s motion for extension of time to respond to the complaint. #43 . The Defendant shall respond to the complaint on or before October 24, 2022. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. (cst)
September 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 47 PAPERLESS ORDER: granting counsel's motion to appear pro hac vice, consent to designation, and request to electronically receive notices of electronic filing. #42 . Attorney Wesley O. Mueller is given permission to appear and participate in this matter on behalf of Defendants Tinno Mobile Technology Corp., Shenzhen Tinno Mobile Co., Ltd., and Tinno USA, Inc. The Clerk is directed to provide this attorney with notification of all electronic filings via the email address set forth in the motion. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. (cst)
September 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 46 PAPERLESS ORDER: granting counsel's motion to appear pro hac vice, consent to designation, and request to electronically receive notices of electronic filing. #41 . Attorney Leonard Z. Hua is given permission to appear and participate in this matter on behalf of Defendants Tinno Mobile Technology Corp., Shenzhen Tinno Mobile Co., Ltd., and Tinno USA, Inc. The Clerk is directed to provide this attorney with notification of all electronic filings via the email address set forth in the motion. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. (cst)
September 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 45 PAPERLESS ORDER: granting counsel's motion to appear pro hac vice, consent to designation, and request to electronically receive notices of electronic filing. #40 . Attorney John K. Winn is given permission to appear and participate in this matter on behalf of Defendants Tinno Mobile Technology Corp., Shenzhen Tinno Mobile Co., Ltd., and Tinno USA, Inc. The Clerk is directed to provide this attorney with notification of all electronic filings via the email address set forth in the motion. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. (cst)
September 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 44 PAPERLESS ORDER: granting counsel's motion to appear pro hac vice, consent to designation, and request to electronically receive notices of electronic filing. #39 . Attorney James W. Sanner is given permission to appear and participate in this matter on behalf of Defendants Tinno Mobile Technology Corp., Shenzhen Tinno Mobile Co., Ltd., and Tinno USA, Inc. The Clerk is directed to provide this attorney with notification of all electronic filings via the email address set forth in the motion. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. (cst)
September 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 43 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer to Complaint by Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.. Attorney Jeremy Todd Elman added to party Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Elman, Jeremy)
September 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 42 Defendant's MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Wesley O Mueller. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-15975374 by SHENZHEN TINNO MOBILE CO., LTD., TINNO MOBILE TECHNOLOGY CORP., TINNO USA, INC.. Responses due by 10/7/2022 (Attachments: #1 Certification, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Fuller, Andrew)
September 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 41 Defendant's MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Leonard Z Hua. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-15975357 by SHENZHEN TINNO MOBILE CO., LTD., TINNO MOBILE TECHNOLOGY CORP., TINNO USA, INC.. Responses due by 10/7/2022 (Attachments: #1 Certification, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Fuller, Andrew)
September 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 40 Defendant's MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for John K Winn. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-15975296 by SHENZHEN TINNO MOBILE CO., LTD., TINNO MOBILE TECHNOLOGY CORP., TINNO USA, INC.. Responses due by 10/7/2022 (Attachments: #1 Certification, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Fuller, Andrew)
September 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 39 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for James W. Sanner. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-15974844 by SHENZHEN TINNO MOBILE CO., LTD., TINNO MOBILE TECHNOLOGY CORP., TINNO USA, INC.. Attorney Andrew Jay Fuller added to party SHENZHEN TINNO MOBILE CO., LTD.(pty:dft), Attorney Andrew Jay Fuller added to party TINNO MOBILE TECHNOLOGY CORP. (pty:dft). Responses due by 10/7/2022 (Attachments: #1 Certification, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Fuller, Andrew)
September 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 38 PAPERLESS ORDER: granting Defendant Tinno USA, Inc.'s, motion for extension of time to respond to the complaint. #37 . The Defendant shall respond to the complaint on or before October 27, 2022. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. (cst)
September 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 37 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint for Patent Infringement re #1 Complaint,,,, by TINNO USA, INC.. Attorney Andrew Jay Fuller added to party TINNO USA, INC. (pty:dft). Responses due by 10/7/2022 (Fuller, Andrew)
September 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 36 PAPERLESS ORDER: granting the parties' agreed motion for extension of time to respond to the complaint. #35 . Defendants HMD America, Inc.; Best Buy Co., Inc.; Best Buy Stores L.P.; and Target Corp. shall respond to the complaint on or before October 24, 2022. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. (cst)
September 23, 2022 Opinion or Order eset Response/Answer Due Deadline per DE#38: TINNO USA, INC. response/answer due 10/27/2022. (scn)
September 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 35 Agreed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint,,,, by HMD America, Inc., Best Buy Co., Inc., Best Buy Stores L.P. and Target Corp. by Bell Northern Research, LLC. (Rojas, Jose)
September 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 34 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint,,,, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Bell Northern Research, LLC. HMD AMERICA, INC. served on 9/6/2022, response/answer due 9/27/2022. (Rojas, Jose)
September 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 33 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Bell Northern Research, LLC. TINNO MOBILE TECHNOLOGY CORP. waiver sent on 9/19/2022, response/answer due 12/19/2022. (Rojas, Jose)
September 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 32 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Bell Northern Research, LLC. SHENZHEN TINNO MOBILE CO., LTD. waiver sent on 9/19/2022, response/answer due 12/19/2022. (Rojas, Jose)
September 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 31 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Bell Northern Research, LLC. Unisoc Technologies Co., Ltd. waiver sent on 9/19/2022, response/answer due 12/19/2022. See DE #30 for image. (pes)
September 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 30 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Bell Northern Research, LLC. Unisoc Technologies Co., Ltd. waiver sent on 9/19/2022, response/answer due 11/18/2022. (Rojas, Jose)
September 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 29 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Bell Northern Research, LLC. SPREADTRUM COMMUNICATIONS USA, INC. waiver sent on 9/19/2022, response/answer due 11/18/2022. (Rojas, Jose)
September 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 28 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Bell Northern Research, LLC. HMD GLOBAL OY waiver sent on 9/19/2022, response/answer due 12/19/2022. (Rojas, Jose)
September 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 27 PAPERLESS ORDER: granting Defendant Walmart Inc.'s unopposed motion for extension of time to respond to the complaint. #26 . Defendant Walmart Inc.'s response to the complaint is due on or before October 24, 2022. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. (cst)
September 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Reset Response/Answer Due Deadline per DE#27: Walmart Inc.'s response/answer due 10/24/2022. (scn)
September 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 26 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint for Patent Infringement re #1 Complaint,,,, by Walmart Inc.. Attorney Ardith M. Bronson added to party Walmart Inc.(pty:dft). Responses due by 9/30/2022 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Bronson, Ardith)
September 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 25 Clerk's Notice to Filer re #18 Summons Returned Executed as to USA, #16 Summons Returned Executed as to USA, #14 Summons Returned Executed as to USA, #19 Summons Returned Executed as to USA, #22 Summons Returned Executed as to USA, #20 Summons Returned Executed as to USA, #17 Summons Returned Executed as to USA, #15 Summons Returned Executed as to USA, #23 Summons Returned Executed as to USA, #21 Summons Returned Executed as to USA. Wrong Event Selected; ERROR - The Filer selected the wrong event. The document was re-docketed by the Clerk, see DE# 24 . It is not necessary to refile this document. (scn)
September 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 24 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 Best Buy Co., Inc. served on 9/1/2022, response/answer due 9/22/2022; Best Buy Stores L.P. served on 9/1/2022, response/answer due 9/22/2022; Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. served on 9/2/2022, response/answer due 9/23/2022; SHENZHEN TINNO MOBILE CO., LTD. served on 9/9/2022, response/answer due 9/30/2022; SPREADTRUM COMMUNICATIONS USA, INC. served on 9/1/2022, response/answer due 9/22/2022; TINNO MOBILE TECHNOLOGY CORP. served on 9/9/2022, response/answer due 9/30/2022; TINNO USA, INC. served on 9/6/2022, response/answer due 9/27/2022; Target Corp. served on 9/2/2022, response/answer due 9/23/2022; Unisoc Technologies Co., Ltd. served on 9/6/2022, response/answer due 9/27/2022; Walmart Inc. served on 9/1/2022, response/answer due 9/22/2022. (scn)
September 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 23 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed by Bell Northern Research, LLC. Walmart Inc. served on 9/1/2022, response/answer due 9/22/2022. (Rojas, Jose) Date Modified on 9/13/2022 (scn).
September 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 22 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed by Bell Northern Research, LLC. Unisoc Technologies Co., Ltd. served on 9/6/2022, response/answer due 9/27/2022. (Rojas, Jose) Date Modified on 9/13/2022 (scn).
September 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 21 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed by Bell Northern Research, LLC. TINNO USA, INC. served on 9/6/2022, response/answer due 9/27/2022. 7(Rojas, Jose) Text Modified on 9/13/2022 (scn).
September 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 20 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed by Bell Northern Research, LLC. TINNO MOBILE TECHNOLOGY CORP. served on 9/9/2022, response/answer due 9/30/2022. (Rojas, Jose) Date Modified on 9/13/2022 (scn).
September 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed by Bell Northern Research, LLC. Target Corp. served on 9/2/2022, response/answer due 9/23/2022. (Rojas, Jose) Date Modified on 9/13/2022 (scn).
September 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed by Bell Northern Research, LLC. SPREADTRUM COMMUNICATIONS USA, INC. served on 9/1/2022, response/answer due 9/22/2022. (Rojas, Jose) Date Modified on 9/13/2022 (scn).
September 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed by Bell Northern Research, LLC. SHENZHEN TINNO MOBILE CO., LTD. served on 9/9/2022, response/answer due 9/30/2022. (Rojas, Jose) Date Modified on 9/13/2022 (scn).
September 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed by Bell Northern Research, LLC. Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. served on 9/2/2022, response/answer due 9/23/2022. (Rojas, Jose) Date Modified on 9/13/2022 (scn).
September 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed by Bell Northern Research, LLC. Best Buy Stores L.P. served on 9/1/2022, response/answer due 9/22/2022. (Rojas, Jose) Date Modified on 9/13/2022 (scn).
September 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed by Bell Northern Research, LLC. Best Buy Co., Inc. served on 9/1/2022, response/answer due 9/22/2022. (Rojas, Jose) Date Modified on 9/13/2022 (scn).
September 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 PAPERLESS ORDER: granting counsel's motion to appear pro hac vice, consent to designation, and request to electronically receive notices of electronic filing. #11 . Attorney Paul Richter is given permission to appear and participate in this matter on behalf of Plaintiff Bell Northern Research, LLC. The Clerk is directed to provide this attorney with notification of all electronic filings via the email address set forth in the motion. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. (cst)
September 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 PAPERLESS ORDER: granting counsel's motion to appear pro hac vice, consent to designation, and request to electronically receive notices of electronic filing. #10 . Attorney Christopher Clayton is given permission to appear and participate in this matter on behalf of Plaintiff Bell Northern Research, LLC. The Clerk is directed to provide this attorney with notification of all electronic filings via the email address set forth in the motion. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. (cst)
September 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Paul Richter. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-15922208 by Bell Northern Research, LLC. Responses due by 9/16/2022 (Attachments: #1 Certification of Paul Richter, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Rojas, Jose)
September 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Christopher Clayton. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-15922172 by Bell Northern Research, LLC. Responses due by 9/16/2022 (Attachments: #1 Certification Certification of Christopher Clayton, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Rojas, Jose)
August 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MAGISTRATE JUDGE GOODMAN'S DISCOVERY PROCEDURES ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman on 8/30/2022. See attached document for full details. (fbn)
August 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Order Requiring Discovery and Scheduling Conference and Order Referring Discovery Matters to the Magistrate Judge. ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman for Discovery Matters. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr on 8/26/2022. See attached document for full details. (scn)
August 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Bell Northern Research, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Hilco IP Merchant Capital, LLC, Corporate Parent Hilco Patent Acquisition 56, Corporate Parent Hilco, Inc. for Bell Northern Research, LLC (Rojas, Jose)
August 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Bar Letter re: Admissions sent to attorney Paul Richter and Christopher Clayton, mailing date August 26, 2022, (pt)
August 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 FORM AO 120 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK. (Attachments: #1 Complaint and Exhibits) (scn)
August 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Summons Issued as to HUAQIN CO., LTD., SHENZHEN CHINO-E COMMUNICATION CO., LTD. (scn)
August 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Best Buy Co., Inc., Best Buy Stores L.P., HMD AMERICA, INC., HMD GLOBAL OY, Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd., SHENZHEN TINNO MOBILE CO., LTD., SPREADTRUM COMMUNICATIONS USA, INC., TINNO MOBILE TECHNOLOGY CORP., TINNO USA, INC., Target Corp., Unisoc Technologies Co., Ltd., WINGTECH INTERNATIONAL, INC., Walmart Inc., Wingtech Technology Co., Ltd. (scn)
August 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (scn)
August 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15901609, filed by Bell Northern Research, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s) Summons Best Buy Co., Inc., #3 Summon(s) Summons Best Buy LP, #4 Summon(s) Summons Shenzhen Tinno Mobile, #5 Summon(s) Summons Spreadtrum, #6 Summon(s) Summons Tinno Mobile, #7 Summon(s) Summons Tinno USA, #8 Summon(s) Summons Wingtech International, #9 Summon(s) Summons HMD America, #10 Summon(s) Summons HMD Global, #11 Summon(s) Summons Hon Hai, #12 Summon(s) Summons Huaqin, #13 Summon(s) Summons Shenzhen Chino-E, #14 Summon(s) Summons Target Corp., #15 Summon(s) Summons Unisoc, #16 Summon(s) Summons Walmart, #17 Summon(s) Summons Wingtech Tech, #18 Exhibit Exhibit A, #19 Exhibit Exhibit B, #20 Exhibit Exhibit C, #21 Exhibit Exhibit D, #22 Exhibit Exhibit E, #23 Exhibit Exhibit F, #24 Exhibit Exhibit G, #25 Exhibit Exhibit H, #26 Exhibit Exhibit I, #27 Exhibit Exhibit J, #28 Exhibit Exhibit K, #29 Exhibit Exhibit L, #30 Exhibit Exhibit M)(Rojas, Jose)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bell Northern Research, LLC v. HMD AMERICA, INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bell Northern Research, LLC
Represented By: Jose Ignacio Rojas
Represented By: Alexander Frederick Rojas
Represented By: Christopher Clayton
Represented By: Paul Richter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HMD AMERICA, INC.
Represented By: Joseph William Bain
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HMD GLOBAL OY
Represented By: Joseph William Bain
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SHENZHEN CHINO-E COMMUNICATION CO., LTD.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.
Represented By: Jeremy Todd Elman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TINNO MOBILE TECHNOLOGY CORP.
Represented By: Andrew Jay Fuller
Represented By: James W. Sanner
Represented By: John K. Winn
Represented By: Leonard Z. Hua
Represented By: Wesley O. Mueller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SHENZHEN TINNO MOBILE CO., LTD.
Represented By: Andrew Jay Fuller
Represented By: James W. Sanner
Represented By: John K. Winn
Represented By: Leonard Z. Hua
Represented By: Wesley O. Mueller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TINNO USA, INC.
Represented By: Andrew Jay Fuller
Represented By: James W. Sanner
Represented By: John K. Winn
Represented By: Leonard Z. Hua
Represented By: Wesley O. Mueller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unisoc Technologies Co., Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SPREADTRUM COMMUNICATIONS USA, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wingtech Technology Co., Ltd.
Represented By: Andrew Jay Fuller
Represented By: Christopher Gass
Represented By: David M. Airan
Represented By: Nicole E. Kopinski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WINGTECH INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Represented By: Andrew Jay Fuller
Represented By: Christopher Gass
Represented By: David M. Airan
Represented By: Nicole E. Kopinski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HUAQIN CO., LTD.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Best Buy Co., Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Best Buy Stores L.P.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Target Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walmart Inc.
Represented By: Ardith M. Bronson
Represented By: Joseph William Bain
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?