Jackson, III v. Kogan et al
| Curtis James Jackson, III p/k/a 50 Cent and Curtis James Jackson, III |
| Angela Kogan, Perfection Plastic Surgery Inc. d/b/a Perfection Plastic Surgery and MedSpa and Perfection Plastic Surgery Inc. doing business as Perfection Plastic Surgery & MedSpa |
| 1:2022cv22972 |
| September 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Jonathan Goodman |
| Robert N Scola |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
PAPERLESS ORDER: The Court grants the Plaintiff leave to file a five-page surreply no later than November 17, 2022 that will be limited to addressing only novel arguments or issues of law raised in the Defendant's reply. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. (eau)
|
|
Filing 19
Plaintiff's MOTION for Leave to File a Surreply to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss by Curtis James Jackson, III. (Rebak, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 18
REPLY to Response to Motion re #16 MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Complaint FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Angela Kogan, Perfection Plastic Surgery Inc.. (Heitner, Darren)
|
|
Filing 17
RESPONSE in Opposition re #16 MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Complaint FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss filed by Curtis James Jackson, III. Replies due by 11/2/2022. (Paz, Alejandro)
|
|
Filing 16
MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Complaint FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Angela Kogan, Perfection Plastic Surgery Inc.. Responses due by 10/26/2022 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Affidavit)(Heitner, Darren)
|
|
Filing 15
SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Curtis James Jackson, III. Perfection Plastic Surgery Inc. served on 9/21/2022, response/answer due 10/12/2022. (Paz, Alejandro)
|
|
Filing 14
SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Curtis James Jackson, III. Angela Kogan served on 9/22/2022, response/answer due 10/13/2022. (Paz, Alejandro)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Darren Adam Heitner on behalf of Angela Kogan, Perfection Plastic Surgery Inc.. Attorney Darren Adam Heitner added to party Angela Kogan(pty:dft), Attorney Darren Adam Heitner added to party Perfection Plastic Surgery Inc.(pty:dft). (Heitner, Darren)
|
|
Filing 12
Summons Issued as to Angela Kogan, Perfection Plastic Surgery Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s))(ebz)
|
|
Filing 11
PAPERLESS ORDER: The Court grants #5 , #6 , #7 counsels' Motions to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. Attorneys Reena Jain, Eamon O'Kelly, and Craig Weiner are given permission to appear and participate in this matter on behalf of Plaintiff Curtis James Jackson III. The Clerk is directed to provide these attorneys with notification of all electronic filings via the email address set forth in their respective motions. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. (eau)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) Summons for Issuance re: Perfection Plastic Surgery, Inc. by Curtis James Jackson, III (Rebak, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) Summons for Issuance re: Angela Kogan by Curtis James Jackson, III (Rebak, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Reena Jain. Pay.gov Agency Tracking ID FLSDC-15959871. Filing Fee $ 200.00 by Curtis James Jackson, III. Responses due by 10/3/2022 (Attachments: #1 Certification of Reena Jain)(Rebak, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Eamon O'Kelly. Pay.gov Agency Tracking ID FLSDC-15959615. Filing Fee $ 200.00 by Curtis James Jackson, III. Responses due by 10/3/2022 (Attachments: #1 Certification of Eamon O'Kellly)(Rebak, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Craig Weiner. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-15959821 by Curtis James Jackson, III. Responses due by 10/3/2022 (Attachments: #1 Certification of Craig Weiner)(Rebak, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 5
MAGISTRATE JUDGE GOODMAN'S DISCOVERY PROCEDURES ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman on 9/19/2022. See attached document for full details. (fbn)
|
|
Filing 4
Order Requiring Discovery and Scheduling Conference and ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman for Discovery Matters. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. on 9/19/2022. See attached document for full details. (ls)
|
|
Filing 3
FORM AO 120 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (rbe)
|
|
Filing 2
Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (rbe)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number BFLSDC-15956309, filed by Curtis James Jackson, III p/k/a 50 Cent. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rebak, Joseph)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
