De Rosario Rodriguez Rodriguez et al v. Mendoza Jaddou et al
| Idelis De Rosario Rodriguez Rodriguez and Michael Wadi Acra |
| Director of Citizenship and Immigration Services( USCIS), Director of Nebraska Service Center for United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and Secretary of U. S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) |
| 1:2022cv23351 |
| October 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Lauren Fleischer Louis |
| K Michael Moore |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Director of Citizenship and Immigration Services( USCIS), Director of Nebraska Service Center for United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), Secretary of U. S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (rbe) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge K. Michael Moore. (rbe) |
| Filing 1 Petition (Complaint) for Writ of Mandamus against All Defendants. Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-16024258, filed by Idelis De Rosario Rodriguez Rodriguez, Michael Wadi Acra. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Summon(s), #6 Summon(s), #7 Summon(s), #8 Summon(s))Case restricted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. (Soto, Eduardo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
