Lugo v. Sephora USA Inc.
| Ruben Lugo |
| Sephora USA Inc. |
| 1:2022cv23670 |
| November 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Joan A Lenard |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Plaintiff's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Ruben Lugo (Rocha, Jocelyn) |
| Filing 9 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by Sephora USA Inc. identifying Other Affiliate LVMH Moet Hennessy-Louis Vuitton SE for Sephora USA Inc. (Marlowe, Caren) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by Sephora USA Inc.. (Marlowe, Caren) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Sarah Grace Hock on behalf of Sephora USA Inc.. Attorney Sarah Grace Hock added to party Sephora USA Inc.(pty:dft). (Hock, Sarah) |
Filing 6
PAPERLESS ORDER GRANTING #5 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint. Defendant shall have until and including December 6, 2022 to respond to the Complaint. This entry constitutes the PAPERLESS ORDER in its entirety. Signed by Judge Joan A. Lenard on 11/30/2022. (gie)
|
| Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by Sephora USA Inc.. Attorney Caren Skversky Marlowe added to party Sephora USA Inc.(pty:dft). (Marlowe, Caren) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Ruben Lugo. Sephora USA Inc. served on 11/9/2022, response/answer due 11/30/2022. (Saavedra, Nathaly) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Sephora USA Inc.. (aao) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Joan A. Lenard. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lauren F. Louis is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (aao) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sephora USA Inc.. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-16087572, filed by Ruben Lugo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summon(s))(Saavedra, Nathaly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lugo v. Sephora USA Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ruben Lugo | |
| Represented By: | Jocelyn Rebecca Rocha |
| Represented By: | Juan J. Perez |
| Represented By: | Nathaly Saavedra |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Sephora USA Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Caren Skversky Marlowe |
| Represented By: | Sarah Grace Hock |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
