La Rosa Corzo v. USCIS
Gabino La Rosa Corzo |
USCIS |
1:2022cv23688 |
November 9, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Kathleen M Williams |
Other Immigration Actions |
05 U.S.C. ยง 0551 Administrative Procedure Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE - Attorney Admissions has not updated email information for attorney David Anthony Garcia. Attorney has not followed the required procedures for updating their email information with the Court. Attorney is instructed to go to their PACER account, Manage My Account, to complete the process of updating their email information. See the Court's website for detailed instructions. #www.flsd.uscourts.gov/updating-your-information. (cw) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed by Gabino La Rosa Corzo. Office of the General Counsel, USCIS served on 11/17/2022, response/answer due 1/17/2023. (For Image See DE#4 ) (cds) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed by Gabino La Rosa Corzo. U.S. Attorney's Office served on 11/15/2022, response/answer due 1/17/2023. ( For Image See DE#4 ) (cds) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Change of Address, Email or Law Firm Name by David Anthony Garcia (Garcia, David) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed by Gabino La Rosa Corzo. Assistant Attorney General for Administration served on 11/18/2022, response/answer due 1/17/2023. (Garcia, David) Modified Text on 12/1/2022 (cds). |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to USCIS, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (pcs) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Kathleen M. Williams. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (pcs) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against USCIS. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-16091211, filed by Gabino La Rosa Corzo. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Exhibit Exh. A, I-485 as submitted)Case restricted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. (Garcia, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: La Rosa Corzo v. USCIS | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Gabino La Rosa Corzo | |
Represented By: | David Anthony Garcia |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: USCIS | |
Represented By: | Noticing INS Attorney |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.