La Rosa Corzo v. USCIS
Plaintiff: Gabino La Rosa Corzo
Defendant: USCIS
Case Number: 1:2022cv23688
Filed: November 9, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Kathleen M Williams
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 1, 2022 Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE - Attorney Admissions has not updated email information for attorney David Anthony Garcia. Attorney has not followed the required procedures for updating their email information with the Court. Attorney is instructed to go to their PACER account, Manage My Account, to complete the process of updating their email information. See the Court's website for detailed instructions. #www.flsd.uscourts.gov/updating-your-information. (cw)
November 30, 2022 Filing 7 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed by Gabino La Rosa Corzo. Office of the General Counsel, USCIS served on 11/17/2022, response/answer due 1/17/2023. (For Image See DE#4 ) (cds)
November 30, 2022 Filing 6 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed by Gabino La Rosa Corzo. U.S. Attorney's Office served on 11/15/2022, response/answer due 1/17/2023. ( For Image See DE#4 ) (cds)
November 30, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE of Change of Address, Email or Law Firm Name by David Anthony Garcia (Garcia, David)
November 30, 2022 Filing 4 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed by Gabino La Rosa Corzo. Assistant Attorney General for Administration served on 11/18/2022, response/answer due 1/17/2023. (Garcia, David) Modified Text on 12/1/2022 (cds).
November 10, 2022 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to USCIS, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (pcs)
November 9, 2022 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Kathleen M. Williams. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (pcs)
November 9, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against USCIS. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-16091211, filed by Gabino La Rosa Corzo. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Exhibit Exh. A, I-485 as submitted)Case restricted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. (Garcia, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: La Rosa Corzo v. USCIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gabino La Rosa Corzo
Represented By: David Anthony Garcia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USCIS
Represented By: Noticing INS Attorney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?