Kelley v. Florida Department of Corrections
Susan Marie Kelley |
State of Florida and Florida Department of Corrections |
1:2022cv23873 |
November 28, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Raag Singhal |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT. Case transferred from Florida Southern has been opened in Middle District of Florida as case 2:22-cv-00767, filed 12/05/2022. (bb) |
Filing 4 ORDER TRANSFERRING VENUE Closing Case. The Clerk of Court shall take all necessary steps to ensure the prompt TRANSFER of this action to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. Motions terminated: #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Susan Marie Kelley. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 12/1/2022. See attached document for full details. (pcs) |
SYSTEM ENTRY - Case 1:22-cv-23873 electronically transferred out to Florida Middle. (pcs) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Susan Marie Kelley. (pes) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Raag Singhal. (pes) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION/PETITION (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. Filing fee $ 5.00. IFP Filed, filed by Susan Marie Kelley.(pes) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.