UI Technologies, Inc. et al v. Ricoma International Corp. et al
UI Technologies, Inc. and UI Digital, Inc. |
Ricoma International Corp., Wenrui Henry Ma, Miguel Andoni Ciarreta, Guofeng Frank Ma, Wenrui " Henry " Ma and Guofeng " Frank " Ma |
1:2022cv24264 |
December 30, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Darrin P Gayles |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 0271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. Attorney Marc E. Hankin is permitted to appear before this Court on behalf of UI Technologies, Inc. and UI Digital, Inc. for all purposes relating to this action. The clerk is directed to provide Notice of Electronic Filings to Marc E. Hankin at CourtFiling@HankinPatentLaw.com. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles on 2/3/2023. (mja) |
Filing 9 PAPERLESS ORDER staying this action and closing for administrative purposes in light of the parties' Joint Notice Regarding Mediation. However, the parties may proceed with previously scheduled discovery. This matter is set for a telephonic status conference on March 1, 2023, at 10:00 a.m. Counsel shall enter their appearances telephonically using the following dial-in information: Dial-in Number 888-273-3658; Access Code 7032614; Security Code 5170. Please dial in at least ten minutes before the Status Conference begins and wait until your case is called. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (hs01) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Marc E. Hankin. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-16261423 by UI Digital, Inc., UI Technologies, Inc.. Responses due by 2/6/2023 (Attachments: #1 Certification, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Nelles, Matthew) |
Filing 7 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to Judge Darrin P. Gayles for all further proceedings, accepted and signed on 1/18/2023. Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II no longer assigned to case Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 1/18/2023. See attached document for full details. (jas) |
Filing 6 Notice of Pending, Refiled, Related or Similar Actions by UI Digital, Inc., UI Technologies, Inc. (Nelles, Matthew) |
Filing 5 Bar Letter re: Admissions sent to attorney Marc E. Hankin, mailing date January 3, 2023, (pt) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Miguel Andoni Ciarreta, Guofeng " Frank " Ma, Ricoma International Corp., Wenrui " Henry " Ma. (rbe) |
Filing 3 FORM AO 120 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (rbe) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (rbe) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-16207428, filed by UI Technologies, Inc., UI Digital, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit, #12 Summon(s), #13 Summon(s), #14 Summon(s), #15 Summon(s))(Nelles, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.