Lazo-Cardenas v. Director
Plaintiff: Leandro Lazo-Cardenas
Defendant: Director, National Benefits Center, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and Director
Case Number: 1:2023cv20241
Filed: January 20, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Darrin P Gayles
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 28, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. Unless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion shall be double-spaced in Times New Roman 12-point typeface. Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the striking of the motion or dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (hs01)
February 1, 2023 Filing 5 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed by Leandro Lazo-Cardenas. Director served on 1/26/2023, response/answer due 3/27/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Proof of Delivery)(Prada, Mark)
January 23, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Noticing INS Attorney on behalf of Director. Attorney Noticing INS Attorney added to party Director(pty:dft). (nan)
January 23, 2023 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Director, USCIS National Benefits Center, U.S. Attorney General, United States Attorney's OfficeSouthern District of Florida. (nan)
January 20, 2023 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (nan)
January 20, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Director, National Benefits Center, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-16256333, filed by Leandro Lazo-Cardenas. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))Case restricted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. (Prada, Mark)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lazo-Cardenas v. Director
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Leandro Lazo-Cardenas
Represented By: Mark Andrew Prada
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Director, National Benefits Center, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Director
Represented By: Noticing INS Attorney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?