Justin v. Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Magdalie Justin
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 1:2023cv20326
Filed: January 25, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline Becerra
Referring Judge: Rodolfo A Ruiz
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 0416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 24, 2023 Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by Social Security Administration. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Blake, Richard)
March 24, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Richard Blake on behalf of Social Security Administration. Attorney Richard Blake added to party Social Security Administration(pty:dft). (Blake, Richard)
February 22, 2023 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (jas)
February 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. USM Service NOT Ordered. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra on 2/6/2023. See attached document for full details. (jao) Modified text on 2/7/2023 (jao).
January 25, 2023 Filing 4 Consent by Pro Se Litigant (Non-Prisoner) Magdalie Justin to receive Notices of Electronic Filing at email address: Billpymntsonline@gmail.com (ebz)
January 25, 2023 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Magdalie Justin. (ebz)
January 25, 2023 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pursuant to the Clerks directive of this cause, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (ebz)
January 25, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration. Filing fees $ 402.00, Not Paid, IFP Filed, filed by Magdalie Justin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summon(s))(ebz)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Justin v. Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Magdalie Justin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Represented By: Noticing Social Security US Attorney
Represented By: Richard Blake
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?