ZAGURY v. DERMSTORE LLC
| NATALIE ZAGURY |
| DERMSTORE LLC |
| 1:2023cv20582 |
| February 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Federico A Moreno |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER denying as moot #3 Motion to Compel, in light of the #6 Notice of Settlement referenced in the #7 Final Order of Dismissal. Signed by Judge Federico A. Moreno on 3/7/2023. See attached document for full details. (aaa)
|
|
Filing 7
FINAL ORDER of Dismissal. In light of the #6 Notice of Settlement, this case is DISMISSED. The Court shall retain jurisdiction for six months to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement. Closing Case. Signed by Judge Federico A. Moreno on 3/7/2023. See attached document for full details. (aaa)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Settlement by NATALIE ZAGURY (Shamis, Andrew) |
| Filing 5 Defendant's Corporate Disclosure Statement by DERMSTORE LLC identifying Corporate Parent PC Beauty Inc. for DERMSTORE LLC (Oprison, Christopher) |
| Filing 4 Statement of: Defendant Dermstore LLC's Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement by DERMSTORE LLC (Oprison, Christopher) |
| Filing 3 Defendant's MOTION to Compel Arbitration Or, In The Alternative, Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff's Putative Class Action Complaint And Incorporated Memorandum Of Law by DERMSTORE LLC. Responses due by 3/7/2023 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of Mark Foster)(Oprison, Christopher) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Federico A. Moreno. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (rbe) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Class Action Complaint) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-16323514, filed by DERMSTORE LLC. No Answer / Motion to Dismiss Filed. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - Other State Court Filings)(Oprison, Christopher) Modified text & attachment description on 2/14/2023 (rbe). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: ZAGURY v. DERMSTORE LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: NATALIE ZAGURY | |
| Represented By: | Andrew John Shamis |
| Represented By: | Christopher Chagas Gold |
| Represented By: | Garrett O. Berg |
| Represented By: | Scott Adam Edelsberg |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: DERMSTORE LLC | |
| Represented By: | Christopher George Oprison |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
