Dubitzky v. Google, LLC
Abi Roy Dubitzky and Roy Miller |
Google LLC |
1:2023cv20726 |
February 24, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Cecilia M Altonaga |
Paul C Huck |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 0101 Copyright Infringement |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 FORM AO 121 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. COPYRIGHT OFFICE with DE#12. (scn) |
Filing 12 ORDER granting #7 Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS #1 (State Court Complaint), FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Google LLC; denying #11 Motion to Amend. Closing Case. Signed by Chief Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga on 4/3/2023. See attached document for full details. (ps1) |
Filing 11 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), by Abi Roy Dubitzky. Responses due by 4/14/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(scn) |
Filing 10 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re #7 Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint) filed by Google LLC. (Whitaker, Damon) |
Filing 9 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Senior Judge Paul C. Huck recused. Case reassigned to Chief Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga for all further proceedings Signed by Senior Judge Paul C. Huck on 3/22/2023. See attached document for full details. (jc) |
Filing 8 RESPONSE to Motion re #7 Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint) filed by Abi Roy Dubitzky (Miller). Replies due by 3/29/2023. (scn) |
Filing 7 Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint) by Google LLC. Responses due by 3/31/2023 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Tab 1 (WHOIS for avi-dubitzky.info), #2 Exhibit Tab 2 (screenshots of 2 URLs))(Whitaker, Damon) |
Filing 6 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by Google LLC identifying Corporate Parent XXVI Holdings Inc., holding company of Google LLC, Corporate Parent Alphabet Inc., holding company of XXVI Holdings Inc. for Google LLC (Whitaker, Damon) |
Filing 5 ORDER GRANTING #4 Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Answer to the Complaint. Response/Answer due 3/17/2023. Signed by Senior Judge Paul C. Huck on 2/28/2023. See attached document for full details. (caw) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time for Defendant to Respond to Complaint by Google LLC (Whitaker, Damon) Event type and text Modified on 2/27/2023 (scn). |
Filing 3 FORM AO 121 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. COPYRIGHT OFFICE (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (rbe) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Senior Judge Paul C. Huck. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (rbe) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Abi Roy Dubitzky a/k/a Roy Miller v. Google, LLC) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-16362530, filed by Google, LLC. No Answer/ Motion to Dismiss Filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Composite Exhibit A- State Court Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Romero, Ezequiel) Modified text & attachment description on 2/24/2023 (rbe). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.