Ginn v. FRLJ-MAZ LLC.
| Laura Ginn |
| FRLJ-MAZ LLC. A Florida Corporation doing business as MAZDA OF NORTH MIAMI |
| 1:2023cv20774 |
| February 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Jonathan Goodman |
| Robert N Scola |
| Truth in Lending |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
Order Administratively Closing Case upon Notice of Settlement. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. on 4/21/2023. See attached document for full details. (jas)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Settlement by Laura Ginn (Feygin, Joshua) |
|
Filing 12
PAPERLESS ORDER: The Court denies, without prejudice, #10 the Defendant's motion to dismiss for lack or jurisdiction or, alternatively, to compel arbitration, because the motion does not contain a pre-filing-conference certification, as required by the Court's Local Rules. Local Rule 7.1(a)(3) requires an attorney filing a motion in a civil case to first confer with all parties or non-parties who may be affected by the relief sought in a good-faith effort to resolve by agreement the issues raised in the motion. The filing attorney must then include in the motion a statement explaining to the Court that (1) all or some of the issues raised in the motion are unopposed; (2) counsel conferred but could not agree on all or some of the issues raised in the motion; or (3) counsel diligently attempted to confer but was unable to reach the opposing counsel. S.D. Fla. L.R. 7.1(a)(3). The purpose of the rule is to ensure judicial economy, prevent courts from wasting time evaluating issues the parties might be in agreement on, inform the Court as to whether it need wait for a response from the opposing party before deciding the motion, and, importantly, force the parties to engage in the meaningful exchange of information and viewpoints. See, e.g., Aguilar v. United Floor Crew, Inc. , No. 14-CIV-61605, 2014 WL 6751663, at *1 (S.D. Fla. Dec. 1, 2014) (Bloom, J.). Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. (kbe)
|
| Filing 11 RESPONSE in Opposition re #10 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction #1 Complaint, Defendant's MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by Laura Ginn. Replies due by 4/26/2023. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Declaration of Atty Feygin)(Feygin, Joshua) |
| Filing 10 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction #1 Complaint, , Defendant's MOTION to Compel Arbitration by FRLJ-MAZ LLC.. Responses due by 5/2/2023 (Reyes, Ricardo) |
|
Filing 9
PAPERLESS ORDER: The Court grants #8 the Defendant's unopposed motion for an extension of time to respond to the complaint. The Defendant must respond to the complaint on or before April 18, 2023. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. (kbe)
|
| Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer by FRLJ-MAZ LLC.. (Reyes, Ricardo) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Ricardo Alberto Reyes on behalf of FRLJ-MAZ LLC.. Attorney Ricardo Alberto Reyes added to party FRLJ-MAZ LLC.(pty:dft). (Reyes, Ricardo) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Laura Ginn. FRLJ-MAZ LLC. served on 3/8/2023, response/answer due 3/29/2023. (Feygin, Joshua) |
|
Filing 5
MAGISTRATE JUDGE GOODMAN'S DISCOVERY PROCEDURES ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman on 3/3/2023. See attached document for full details. (fbn)
|
|
Filing 4
Order Requiring Discovery and Scheduling Conference and Order Referring Discovery Matters to Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr on 2/28/2023. See attached document for full details. (jas)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to FRLJ-MAZ LLC. (rbe) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (rbe) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against FRLJ-MAZ LLC. d/b/a MAZDA OF NORTH MIAMI. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-16377875, filed by Laura Ginn. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s) Summons, #2 Supplement Corporate Disclosure, #3 Supplement Related Cases, #4 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Feygin, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ginn v. FRLJ-MAZ LLC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Laura Ginn | |
| Represented By: | Joshua E. Feygin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: FRLJ-MAZ LLC. A Florida Corporation doing business as MAZDA OF NORTH MIAMI | |
| Represented By: | Ricardo Alberto Reyes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
