Jasper Contractors, Inc. v. Safety Specialty Insurance Company
Jasper Contractors, Inc. |
Safety Specialty Insurance Company |
1:2023cv21351 |
April 10, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Darrin P Gayles |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint re the Notice of Removal with Jury Demand by Safety Specialty Insurance Company. (Jones, Kimberly) |
Set/Reset Response/Answer Due Deadline per order DE#5: Safety Specialty Insurance Company response/answer due 5/8/2023. (drz) |
Filing 5 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #3 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant shall respond to the Complaint on or before May 8, 2023. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (hs01) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. Unless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion shall be double-spaced in Times New Roman 12-point typeface. Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the striking of the motion or dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (hs01) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by Safety Specialty Insurance Company. Responses due by 5/1/2023 (Jones, Kimberly) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (nan) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Miami-Dade) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-16522873, filed by Safety Specialty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A State Court Complaint & Other State Court Documents , #3Exhibit B, No Answer/Motion to Dismiss filed.)(Jones, Kimberly) Modified Attachment Descriptions on 4/11/2023 (nan). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Jasper Contractors, Inc. v. Safety Specialty Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jasper Contractors, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Erin Townsend Perry |
Represented By: | Jeremy Michael Paul |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Safety Specialty Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Kimberly Michelle Gracia Jones |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.