Bell v. Allied Universal Security
| Falisha Bell |
| Allied Universal Security and Allied Universal Security Services |
| 1:2023cv21663 |
| May 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Rodolfo A Ruiz |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 15 U.S.C. § 0002 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
Order Granting #12 Defendant's Motion to Stay and Compel Arbitration. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 6/30/2023. See attached document for full details. (pwn)
|
|
Filing 19
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 6/30/2023. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 6/28/2023. See attached document for full details. (pwn)
|
| Filing 18 Clerk's Notice to Filer re #17 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement. Other Affiliates/Corporate Parents Not Entered; ERROR - The Filer failed to enter all Other Affiliates/Corporate Parents from the Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement. Filer is instructed to refile their Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement and enter the missing Other Affiliates/Corp Parents. Note - Other Affiliates/Corporate Parents do not appear on the docket sheet. (ls) |
| Filing 17 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by Allied Universal Security Services identifying Corporate Parent Allied Universal Security Service, LLC for Allied Universal Security Services (McKamey, Shawn) |
|
Filing 16
PAPERLESS ORDER on #12 Motion to Stay and Compel Arbitration ("Motion"). Plaintiff is reminded that her Response to the Motion is due by June 27, 2023. Failure to file a Response may lead to entry of an order granting the Motion by default. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 6/26/2023. (pwn)
|
| Filing 15 Clerk's Notice to Filer re #12 MOTION to Stay and Compel Arbitration. Motion with Multiple Reliefs Filed as One Relief; ERROR - The Filer selected only one relief event and failed to select the additional corresponding events for each relief requested in the motion. The docket entry was corrected by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile this document but future filings must comply with the instructions in the CM/ECF Attorney User's Manual. (ls) |
|
Filing 14
PAPERLESS ORDER striking #13 Plaintiff's Disclosure pursuant to FRCP 26 ("Disclosure"). Local Rule 26.1(b) of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida provides that "discovery requests, responses, objections, notices or any associated proof of service shall not be filed with the Court until they are used in the proceeding or the court orders their filing." To date, the Disclosure has not been used in this proceeding, nor has the Court ordered its filing. Accordingly, the Disclosure is hereby STRICKEN. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 6/16/2023. (pwn)
|
| Filing 13 "STRICKEN" Disclosure(s) of Federal Rule Procedure 26 by Falisha Bell (ls) Modified on 6/20/2023 (ls). (per DE #14) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Stay Proceedings by Allied Universal Security Services. Attorney Shawn Benson McKamey added to party Allied Universal Security Services(pty:dft). Responses due by 6/27/2023 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B)(McKamey, Shawn). Added MOTION to Compel Arbitration on 6/20/2023 (ls). |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE to Defendant Arbitration/Compel by Falisha Bell. (ls) |
|
Filing 10
Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report and Certificate of Interested Parties. Joint Scheduling Report due by 6/30/2023. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 6/5/2023. See attached document for full details. (ls)
|
| Filing 9 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #7 Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Falisha Bell. Allied Universal Security Services served on 5/23/2023, response/answer due 6/13/2023. (jas) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Allied Universal Security Services. (ls) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Allied Universal Security Services filed in response to Order Granting Motion for Leave, filed by Falisha Bell.(ls) |
| Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE of Compliance re #5 Order. Additional Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) sent to Falisha Bell (ls) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER REQUIRING AMENDED COMPLAINT. Amended Complaint Due on or before June 8, 2023. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 5/9/2023. See attached document for full details. (pwn)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Allied Universal Security. (pc) |
| Filing 3 Clerks Notice of Receipt of Filing Fee received on 5/3/2023 in the amount of $ 402.00, receipt number FLS268839. (vt) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (pc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Allied Universal Security. Filing fees $ 402.00 (DUE), filed by Falisha Bell. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Summon(s))(pc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
