Hickmon v. Jackson et al
| Levory W. Hickmon |
| O'Neil Jackson, Bo Jones, Bolite, Tony Harris, Aaron Brand and CIA Directors |
| 1:2023cv21676 |
| May 1, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Darrin P Gayles |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) / Closing Case. Motions terminated: #6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Levory W. Hickmon. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles on 6/26/2023. See attached document for full details. (pcs)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Levory W. Hickmon. (pcs) |
| Filing 5 SWORN COMPLAINT against CIA Directors, filed by Levory W. Hickmon.(pcs) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Filing Memorandum of Law by Levory W. Hickmon. (scn) |
| Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Bolite, Aaron Brand, Tony Harris, O'Neil Jackson, Bo Jones, filed by Levory W. Hickmon.(scn) |
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. (daa) |
| Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against Bolite, Aaron Brand, Tony Harris, O'Neil Jackson, Bo Jones. Filing fee $ 402.00 (Filing fee not paid/IFP Motion not filed), filed by Levory W. Hickmon.(daa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
