HAMILTON v. Royal Caribbean Group
| BINETTE HAMILTON |
| Royal Caribbean Group and Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. |
| 1:2023cv21948 |
| May 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Federico A Moreno |
| Marine |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Party(ies) Improperly Formatted. The Filer failed to enter the party name(s) in accordance with the CM/ECF Format for Adding Parties for Attorneys Guide. The correction was made. It is not necessary to re-file the document. (nwn) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Royal Caribbean Group. (nwn) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Federico A. Moreno. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (nwn) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ROYAL CARIBBEAN GROUP f/k/a ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES, LTD.,. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-16648115, filed by BINETTE HAMILTON. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Winkleman, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
