ATLAS CONGLOMERATE OF RIDICULOUS PROPORTIONS LLC v. NFT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
| ATLAS CONGLOMERATE OF RIDICULOUS PROPORTIONS LLC |
| NFT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. |
| 1:2023cv22810 |
| July 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Jonathan Goodman |
| Robert N Scola |
| Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Amended MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer to Complaint by NFT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.. (Diaz Barreto, Yolday) |
Filing 9
PAPERLESS ORDER: The Court denies, without prejudice, #8 the Defendant NFT Technologies, Inc.'s motion for extension of time to respond to the complaint because the motion does not contain a proper pre-filing-conference certification, as required by the Court's Local Rules. Local Rule 7.1(a)(3) requires an attorney filing a motion in a civil case to first confer with opposing counsel in a good-faith effort to resolve by agreement the issues raised in the motion. S.D. Fla. L.R. 7.1(a)(3). Counsel's averment that "he reached out to counsel for the Plaintiff... via electronic mail" approximately one hour before filing the motion and that he "also attempted to call" counsel for the Plaintiff less than half an hour before filing the motion, but was unable to reach him, is inadequate and does not amount to a "reasonable effort to confer." "The purpose of the rule is to ensure judicial economy and prevent courts from considering issues the parties could agree on independently, and to ascertain whether the Court need wait for a response from the opposing party before deciding the motion." Aguilar v. United Floor Crew, Inc., No. 14-CIV-61605, 2014 WL 6751663, at *1 (S.D. Fla. Dec. 1, 2014) (Bloom, J.). Accordingly, the Defendant may either refile its motion for extension of time with a proper certification or respond to the complaint on or before September 25, 2023. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. (abo)
|
| Filing 8 Defendant's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Complaint re #1 Complaint, by NFT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.. Responses due by 10/4/2023 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Diaz Barreto, Yolday) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Yolday Diaz Barreto on behalf of NFT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.. Attorney Yolday Diaz Barreto added to party NFT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.(pty:dft). (Diaz Barreto, Yolday) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by ATLAS CONGLOMERATE OF RIDICULOUS PROPORTIONS LLC. NFT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. served on 8/30/2023, response/answer due 9/20/2023. (Heitner, Darren) |
|
Filing 5
MAGISTRATE JUDGE GOODMAN'S DISCOVERY PROCEDURES ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman on 8/2/2023. See attached document for full details. (fbn)
|
|
Filing 4
Order Requiring Discovery and Scheduling Conference and Order Referring Discovery Matters to the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr on 7/31/2023. See attached document for full details. (drz)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to NFT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (wce) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (wce) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against NFT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-16797897, filed by ATLAS CONGLOMERATE OF RIDICULOUS PROPORTIONS LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s), #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B)(Heitner, Darren) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: ATLAS CONGLOMERATE OF RIDICULOUS PROPORTIONS LLC v. NFT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ATLAS CONGLOMERATE OF RIDICULOUS PROPORTIONS LLC | |
| Represented By: | Darren Adam Heitner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: NFT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Yolday Diaz Barreto |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
