Castro v. Gap, Inc.
| Arantza Castro |
| Gap, Inc. doing business as GAP and Gap, Inc. a Delaware Corporation doing business as GAP |
| 1:2023cv22927 |
| August 4, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Rodolfo A Ruiz |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
Order Administratively Closing Case. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 8/30/2023. See attached document for full details. (lgr)
|
| Filing 10 PAPERLESS Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II: Telephonic Status Conference held on 8/30/2023. Order to follow. Attorney Appearance(s): Diego German Mendez, Richard John Adams, Jr, Beth Hilary Storper Joseph, Court Reporter: Ilona Lupowitz, 305-523-5737 / Ilona_lupowitz@flsd.uscourts.gov. (gp) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of Counsel re #4 Order, PLAINTIFF COUNSELS VERIFIED CERTIFICATE OF COUNSEL REGARDING PRIOR FILINGS UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT by Diego German Mendez on behalf of Arantza Castro (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit of Arantza Castro) (Mendez, Diego) |
| Reset Answer Due Deadline: Gap, Inc. answer due 9/18/2023. Per d.e. 7 Order. (mee) |
|
Filing 8
PAPERLESS ORDER setting telephonic status conference for August 30, 2023 at 10:00 A.M. The parties are instructed to call +1 305-990-2559 by no later than 9:55 A.M. The phone conference ID is 482 256 252#. The Court requires that the parties appear via a landline (i.e., not a cellular phone or a speaker phone) if possible for clarity. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 8/25/2023. (lgr)
|
|
Filing 7
PAPERLESS ORDER granting Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time, ECF No. #6 . Defendant shall file a response to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before September 18, 2023. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 8/25/2023. (lgr)
|
| Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by Gap, Inc.. Attorney Beth Hilary Storper Joseph added to party Gap, Inc.(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Storper Joseph, Beth) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Arantza Castro. Gap, Inc. served on 8/7/2023, response/answer due 8/28/2023. (Mendez, Diego) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REQUIRING VERIFIED CERTIFICATE OF COUNSEL REGARDING ANY PRIOR FILINGS UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT AND VERIFIED AFFIDAVIT REGARDING VISITS TO PROPERTY AND USE OF MOBILE WEBSITE. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 8/7/2023. See attached document for full details. (mee)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Gap, Inc. (nwn) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (nwn) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Gap, Inc.. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-16820050, filed by Arantza Castro. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s) Proposed Summons)(Mendez, Diego) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
