Johnson et al, v. Secretary of Florida Department of Corrections et al
| Otha Kenyua Johnson |
| Secretary of Florida Department of Corrections and Warden of South Florida Reception Center |
| Matthew Lewis |
| 1:2023cv23021 |
| August 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Miami Office |
| Roy K Altman |
| Lisette M Reid |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 Clerk's Notice of Compliance: re #15 Order. (Package prepared and placed in U.S. Marshal's Mailbox). (pc) |
Filing 15
ORDER: Directing Service of Summons by a U.S. Marshal or Deputy U.S. Marshal: re #1 Complaint 42 USC 1983 or Bivens, filed by Otha Kenyua Johnson, #6 Complaint, filed by Matthew Lewis. Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 10/4/2023. See attached document for full details. (pc)
|
| Filing 14 Clerk's Notice of Compliance: re #13 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (copy mailed to PB County Sheriff's Office, Inmate Trust Fund Department). (pc) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER: granting #10 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee but Establishing Debt to Clerk of $ 350.00. USM Service NOT Ordered ; granting #11 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee but Establishing Debt to Clerk of $ 350.00. USM Service NOT Ordered. The Court will direct the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the appropriate Defendants in a separate order. See FED. R. CIV. P. 4(c)(3). Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 10/4/2023. See attached document for full details. (pc)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER OF INSTRUCTIONS TO PRO SE LITIGANTS. Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 9/13/2023. See attached document for full details. (drz)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Matthew Lewis. (drz) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Otha Kenyua Johnson. (pc) |
|
Filing 9
PAPERLESS ORDER denying #8 Motion for Referral to Volunteer Attorney Program without prejudice. The Plaintiffs must file a legally sufficient IFP motion, see Order Denying IFP Motions [ECF No. #7 ], and their complaints must survive the screening requirements of 28 U.S.C. 1915A, before we will allow this case to proceed to service. Once that happens, the Plaintiffs will be entitled (if they wish) to file a motion to refer the case to this Court's volunteer attorney program. Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 8/21/2023. (cps)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Referral to Volunteer Attorney Program by Otha Kenyua Johnson. (drz) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER DENYING IFP MOTIONS. We hereby ORDER AND ADJUDGE that Johnson's IFP Motion [ECF No. #3 ] and Lewis's IFP Motion [ECF No. #5 ] are DENIED without prejudice. By September 8, 2023, the Plaintiffs must either (i) pay the entire filing fee or (ii) file an adequate application to proceed IFP. The Clerk shall administratively CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 8/18/2023. See attached document for full details. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit IFP Form) (cps)
|
| Filing 6 Civil Rights Complaint, Motion for Preliminary Injunction or Temporary Restraining Order pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against Secretary of Florida Department of Corrections, Warden of South Florida Reception Center. Filing fee $ 402.00. IFP Filed, filed by Matthew Lewis. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(nan) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Matthew Lewis. (nan) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER. Case No. 23-cv-23022-RKA is hereby CONSOLIDATED with Case No. 23-cv- 23021-RKA. Case No. 23-cv-23022-RKA shall be administratively CLOSED. All future filings shall be made under Johnson v. Dixon, No. 23-cv-23021-RKA. Any pending motions in Case No. 23-cv-23022-RKA are DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk is DIRECTED to docket the Complaint [ECF No. 1] and the Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis [ECF No. 3] from Lewis v. Dixon, No. 23-cv-23022, in Johnson v. Dixon, Case No. 23-cv-23021-RKA. This Order is without prejudice to any party filing a future motion for separate trials under FED. R. CIV. P. 42(b). The Clerk shall docket this Order in the following cases: a. Johnson v. Dixon, No. 23-cv-23021-RKA. b. Lewis v. Dixon, No. 23-cv-23022-RKA Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 8/16/2023. See attached document for full details. (nan)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Otha Kenyua Johnson. (kpe) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Roy K. Altman and Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (kpe) |
| Filing 1 Civil Rights Complaint, and Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Restraining Order pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against Secretary of Florida Department of Corrections, Warden of South Florida Reception Center. Filing fee $ 402.00. IFP Filed, filed by Otha Kenyua Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(kpe) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
