Parks v. Smith et al
| Edward F. Parks |
| Mathew Smith, Mohave County Arizona and Attorney General |
| 1:2023cv23138 |
| August 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Robin L Rosenberg |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT. Case transferred from Florida Southern has been opened in DISTRICT OF ARIZONA as case 3:23-cv-08568, filed 10/05/2023. (bb) |
| SYSTEM ENTRY - Case 1:23-cv-23138 electronically transferred out to Arizona. (nwn) |
Filing 4
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE. The Clerk of Court shall TRANSFER the above-captioned matter, Case No. 23-23138-CIV-RLR, to the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. Closing Case. Signed by Judge Robin L. Rosenberg on 10/2/2023. See attached document for full details. (Attachments: #1 Arizona Judicial Branchs docket in Mohave County) (nwn)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Show Cause by Edward F. Parks. (cds) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Robin L. Rosenberg. (jas) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION/PETITION (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. Filing fee $5.00, Not Paid/No IFP, filed by Edward F. Parks. (jas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
