Larancuent et al v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
| Roberto A. Larancuent and Mariano Argote Munoz |
| U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services |
| 1:2023cv23259 |
| August 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Rodolfo A Ruiz |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE and Administrative Order Closing Case. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 8/25/2023. See attached document for full details. (pwn)
|
| Filing 4 Bar Letter re: Admissions sent to attorney H. Glenn Fogle, Jr., mailing date August 25, 2023, (pt) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (wce) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II. (wce) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-16871718, filed by Roberto A. Larancuent, Mariano Argote Munoz. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s) Garland, #3 Summon(s) Jaddau, #4 Summon(s) Lapointe, #5 Summon(s) Rinehart)Case restricted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. (Lieberman, Brett) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
